home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Text File | 1998-04-02 | 273.9 KB | 6,108 lines |
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Network Working Group P. Newman, Nokia
- Request for Comments: 2297 W. Edwards, Sprint
- Updates: 1987 R. Hinden, Nokia
- Category: Informational E. Hoffman, Nokia
- F. Ching Liaw
- T. Lyon, Nokia
- G. Minshall, Fiberlane
- March 1998
-
-
- Ipsilon's General Switch Management Protocol Specification
- Version 2.0
-
- Status of this Memo
-
- This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does
- not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this
- memo is unlimited.
-
- Copyright Notice
-
- Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1998). All Rights Reserved.
-
-
- Abstract
-
- This memo specifies enhancements to the General Switch Management
- Protocol (GSMP) [RFC1987]. The major enhancement is the addition of
- Quality of Service (QoS) messages. Other improvements have been made
- to the protocol resulting from operational experience. GSMP is a
- general purpose protocol to control an ATM switch. It allows a
- controller to establish and release connections across the switch;
- add and delete leaves on a multicast connection; manage switch ports;
- request configuration information; and request statistics.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 1]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- Table of Contents
-
- 1. Introduction....................................................3
-
- 2. GSMP Packet Encapsulation.......................................4
- 2.1 ATM Encapsulation...........................................4
- 2.2 Ethernet Encapsulation......................................6
-
- 3. Common Definitions and Procedures...............................7
- 3.1 GSMP Packet Format..........................................8
- 3.2 Failure Response Messages..................................11
-
- 4. Connection Management Messages.................................16
- 4.1 Add Branch Message.........................................21
- 4.2 Delete Tree Message........................................23
- 4.3 Verify Tree Message........................................24
- 4.4 Delete All Message.........................................24
- 4.5 Delete Branches Message....................................25
- 4.6 Move Branch Message........................................27
-
- 5. Port Management Messages.......................................29
- 5.1 Port Management Message....................................29
- 5.2 Label Range Message........................................34
-
- 6. State and Statistics Messages..................................37
- 6.1 Connection Activity Message................................38
- 6.2 Statistics Messages........................................40
- 6.2.1 Port Statistics Message..............................44
- 6.2.2 Connection Statistics Message........................44
- 6.2.3 QoS Class Statistics Message.........................44
- 6.3 Report Connection State Message............................45
-
- 7. Configuration Messages.........................................49
- 7.1 Switch Configuration Message...............................50
- 7.2 Port Configuration Message.................................51
- 7.3 All Ports Configuration Message............................57
-
- 8. Event Messages.................................................59
- 8.1 Port Up Message............................................60
- 8.2 Port Down Message..........................................60
- 8.3 Invalid VPI/VCI Message....................................61
- 8.4 New Port Message...........................................61
- 8.5 Dead Port Message..........................................61
-
- 9. Quality of Service Messages....................................61
- 9.1 Abstract Switch Model......................................62
- 9.2 QoS Configuration Message..................................66
- 9.3 Scheduler Establishment Message............................74
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 2]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- 9.4 QoS Class Establishment Message............................78
- 9.5 QoS Release Message........................................85
- 9.6 QoS Connection Management Message..........................86
- 9.7 QoS Failure Response Codes.................................97
-
- 10. Adjacency Protocol............................................97
- 10.1 Packet Format.............................................98
- 10.2 Procedure.................................................101
- 10.3 Loss of Synchronization...................................103
-
- 11. Summary of Failure Response Codes.............................104
-
- 12. Summary of Message Set........................................105
-
- References........................................................107
- Security Considerations...........................................107
- Authors' Addresses................................................107
- Full Copyright Statement..........................................109
-
-
-
- 1. Introduction
-
- The General Switch Management Protocol (GSMP), is a general purpose
- protocol to control an ATM switch. GSMP allows a controller to
- establish and release connections across the switch; add and delete
- leaves on a multicast connection; manage switch ports; request
- configuration information; and request statistics. It also allows the
- switch to inform the controller of asynchronous events such as a link
- going down. GSMP runs across an ATM link connecting the controller to
- the switch, on a control connection (virtual channel) established at
- initialization. GSMP operation across an Ethernet link is also
- specified. The GSMP protocol is asymmetric, the controller being the
- master and the switch being the slave. Multiple switches may be
- controlled by a single controller using multiple instantiations of
- the protocol over separate control connections.
-
- A switch is assumed to contain multiple "ports". Each port is a
- combination of one "input port" and one "output port". Some GSMP
- requests refer to the port as a whole whereas other requests are
- specific to the input port or the output port. ATM cells arrive at
- the switch from an external communication link on incoming virtual
- paths or virtual channels at an input port. ATM cells depart from the
- switch to an external communication link on outgoing virtual paths or
- virtual channels from an output port. Virtual paths on a port or link
- are referenced by their virtual path identifier (VPI). Virtual
- channels on a port or link are referenced by their virtual path and
- virtual channel identifiers (VPI/VCI).
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 3]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- A virtual channel connection across a switch is formed by connecting
- an incoming virtual channel to one or more outgoing virtual channels.
- Virtual channel connections are referenced by the input port on which
- they arrive and the virtual path and virtual channel identifiers
- (VPI/VCI) of their incoming virtual channel. A virtual path
- connection across a switch is formed by connecting an incoming
- virtual path to one or more outgoing virtual paths. Virtual path
- connections are referenced by the input port on which they arrive and
- their virtual path identifier (VPI). In a virtual path connection
- the value of the VCI in each cell on that, connection is not used by
- the switch and remains unchanged by the switch.
-
- GSMP supports point-to-point and point-to-multipoint connections. A
- multipoint-to-point connection is specified by establishing multiple
- point-to-point connections each of them specifying the same output
- branch. A multipoint-to-multipoint connection is specified by
- establishing multiple point-to-multipoint trees each of them
- specifying the same output branches.
-
- In general a virtual channel is established with a certain quality of
- service (QoS). A rich set of QoS messages is introduced in this
- version of the protocol. However, implementation or operation of GSMP
- without any of the messages defined in Section 9, "Quality of service
- messages," is permitted. In this case each virtual channel
- connection or virtual path connection may be assigned a priority when
- it is established. It may be assumed that for virtual connections
- that share the same output port, an ATM cell on a connection with a
- higher priority is much more likely to exit the switch before an ATM
- cell on a connection with a lower priority if they are both in the
- switch at the same time. The number of priorities that each port of
- the switch supports may be obtained from the port configuration
- message.
-
- GSMP contains an adjacency protocol. The adjacency protocol is used
- to synchronize state across the link, to negotiate which version of
- the GSMP protocol to use, to discover the identity of the entity at
- the other end of a link, and to detect when it changes.
-
-
- 2. GSMP Packet Encapsulation
-
- 2.1 ATM Encapsulation
-
- GSMP packets are variable length and for an ATM data link layer they
- are encapsulated directly in an AAL-5 CPCS-PDU [I.363] with an
- LLC/SNAP header as illustrated:
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 4]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- 0 1 2 3
- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | LLC (0xAA-AA-03) | |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ +
- | SNAP (0x00-00-00-88-0C) |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | |
- ~ GSMP Message ~
- | |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Pad (0 - 47 octets) |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | |
- + AAL-5 CPCS-PDU Trailer (8 octets) +
- | |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
-
- (The convention in the documentation of Internet Protocols [RFC1700]
- is to express numbers in decimal. Numbers in hexadecimal format are
- specified by prefacing them with the characters "0x". Data is
- pictured in "big-endian" order. That is, fields are described left to
- right, with the most significant octet on the left and the least
- significant octet on the right. Whenever a diagram shows a group of
- octets, the order of transmission of those octets is the normal order
- in which they are read in English. Whenever an octet represents a
- numeric quantity the left most bit in the diagram is the high order
- or most significant bit. That is, the bit labeled 0 is the most
- significant bit. Similarly, whenever a multi-octet field represents a
- numeric quantity the left most bit of the whole field is the most
- significant bit. When a multi-octet quantity is transmitted, the most
- significant octet is transmitted first. This is the same coding
- convention as is used in the ATM layer [I.361] and AAL-5 [I.363].)
-
- The LLC/SNAP header contains the octets: 0xAA 0xAA 0x03 0x00 0x00
- 0x00 0x88 0x0C. (0x880C is the assigned Ethertype for GSMP.)
-
- The maximum transmission unit (MTU) of the GSMP Message field is 1492
- octets.
-
- The virtual channel over which a GSMP session is established between
- a controller and the switch it is controlling is called the GSMP
- control channel. The default VPI and VCI of the GSMP control channel
- for LLC/SNAP encapsulated GSMP messages on an ATM data link layer is:
-
- VPI = 0
- VCI = 15.
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 5]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- 2.2 Ethernet Encapsulation
-
- GSMP packets may be encapsulated on an Ethernet data link as
- illustrated:
-
- 0 1 2 3
- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Destination Address |
- | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | | |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
- | Source Address |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Ethertype (0x88-0C) | |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
- | |
- ~ GSMP Message ~
- | |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Sender Instance |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Receiver Instance |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Pad |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Frame Check Sequence |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
-
- Destination Address
- For the SYN message of the adjacency protocol the
- Destination Address is the broadcast address
- 0xFFFFFFFFFFFF. (Alternatively, it is also valid to
- configure the node with the unicast 48-bit IEEE MAC address
- of the destination. In this case the configured unicast
- Destination Address is used in the SYN message.) For all
- other messages the Destination Address is the unicast 48-
- bit IEEE MAC address of the destination. This address may
- be discovered from the Source Address field of messages
- received during synchronization of the adjacency protocol.
-
- Source Address
- For all messages the Source Address is the 48-bit IEEE MAC
- address of the sender.
-
- Ethertype
- The assigned Ethertype for GSMP is 0x880C.
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 6]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- GSMP Message
- The maximum transmission unit (MTU) of the GSMP Message
- field is 1492 octets.
-
- Sender Instance
- The Sender Instance number for the link obtained from the
- adjacency protocol. This field is already present in the
- adjacency protocol message. It is appended to all non-
- adjacency GSMP messages in the Ethernet encapsulation to
- offer additional protection against the introduction of
- corrupt state.
-
- Receiver Instance
- The Receiver Instance number is what the sender believes is
- the current instance number for the link, allocated by the
- entity at the far end of the link. This field is already
- present in the adjacency protocol message. It is appended
- to all non-adjacency GSMP messages in the Ethernet
- encapsulation to offer additional protection against the
- introduction of corrupt state.
-
- Pad
- The minimum length of the data field of an Ethernet packet
- is 46 octets. If necessary, padding should be added such
- that it meets the minimum Ethernet frame size. This padding
- should be octets of zero and it is not considered to be
- part of the GSMP message.
-
- After the adjacency protocol has achieved synchronization, for every
- GSMP message received with an Ethernet encapsulation, the receiver
- must check the Source Address from the Ethernet MAC header, the
- Sender Instance, and the Receiver Instance. The incoming GSMP
- message must be discarded if the Sender Instance and the Source
- Address do not match the values of Sender Instance and Sender Name
- stored by the "Update Peer Verifier" operation of the GSMP adjacency
- protocol. The incoming GSMP message must also be discarded if it
- arrives over any port other than the port over which the adjacency
- protocol has achieved synchronization. In addition, the incoming
- message must also be discarded if the Receiver Instance field does
- not match the current value for the Sender Instance of the GSMP
- adjacency protocol.
-
-
- 3. Common Definitions and Procedures
-
- GSMP is a master-slave protocol. The controller issues request
- messages to the switch. Each request message indicates whether a
- response is required from the switch and contains a transaction
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 7]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- identifier to enable the response to be associated with the request.
- The switch replies with a response message indicating either a
- successful result or a failure. There are five classes of GSMP
- request-response message: Connection Management, Port Management,
- State and Statistics, Configuration, and Quality of Service. The
- switch may also generate asynchronous Event messages to inform the
- controller of asynchronous events. Event messages are not
- acknowledged by the controller. There is also an adjacency protocol
- message used to establish synchronization across the link and
- maintain a handshake.
-
- For the request-response messages, each message type has a format for
- the request message and a format for the success response. Unless
- otherwise specified a failure response message is identical to the
- request message that caused the failure, with the Code field
- indicating the nature of the failure. Event messages have only a
- single format defined as they are not acknowledged by the controller.
-
- Switch ports are described by a 32-bit port number. The switch
- assigns port numbers and it may typically choose to structure the 32
- bits into subfields that have meaning to the physical structure of
- the switch (e.g. slot, port). In general, a port in the same physical
- location on the switch will always have the same port number, even
- across power cycles. The internal structure of the port number is
- opaque to the GSMP protocol. However, for the purposes of network
- management such as logging, port naming, and graphical
- representation, a switch may declare the physical location (physical
- slot and port) of each port. Alternatively, this information may be
- obtained by looking up the product identity in a database.
-
- Each switch port also maintains a port session number assigned by the
- switch. A message, with an incorrect port session number must be
- rejected. This allows the controller to detect a link failure and to
- keep state synchronized.
-
- Except for the adjacency protocol message, no GSMP messages may be
- sent across the link until the adjacency protocol has achieved
- synchronization, and all GSMP messages received on a link that does
- not currently have state synchronization must be discarded.
-
- 3.1 GSMP Packet Format
-
- All GSMP messages, except the adjacency protocol message, have the
- following format:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 8]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- 0 1 2 3
- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Version | Message Type | Result | Code |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Transaction Identifier |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | |
- ~ Message Body ~
- | |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
-
- Version
- The version number of the GSMP protocol being used in this
- session. It should be set by the sender of the message to
- the GSMP protocol version negotiated by the adjacency
- protocol.
-
- Message Type
- The GSMP message type. GSMP messages fall into six classes:
- Connection Management, Port Management, State and
- Statistics, Configuration, Quality of Service, and Events.
- Each class has a number of different message types. In
- addition, one Message Type is allocated to the adjacency
- protocol.
-
- Result
- Field in a Connection Management request message, a Port
- Management request message, or a Quality of Service request
- message is used to indicate whether a response is required
- to the request message if the outcome is successful. A
- value of "NoSuccessAck" indicates that the request message
- does not expect a response if the outcome is successful,
- and a value of "AckAll" indicates that a response is
- expected if the outcome is successful. In both cases a
- failure response must be generated if the request fails.
- For Sate and Statistics, and Configuration request
- messages, a value of "NoSuccessAck" in the request message
- is ignored and the request message is handled as if the
- field were set to "AckAll". (This facility was added to
- reduce the control traffic in the case where the controller
- periodically checks that the state in the switch is
- correct. If the controller does not use this capability,
- all request messages should be sent with a value of
- "AckAll.")
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 9]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- In a response message the result field can have three
- values: "Success," "More," and "Failure". The "Success" and
- "More" results both indicate a success response. The "More"
- result indicates that the success response exceeds the
- maximum transmission unit of the data link and that one or
- more further messages will be sent to complete the success
- response. All messages that belong to the same success
- response will have the same Transaction Identifier. The
- "Success" result indicates a success response that may be
- contained in a single message or the final message of a
- success response spanning multiple messages.
-
- The encoding of the result field is:
-
- NoSuccessAck: Result = 1
- AckAll: Result = 2
- Success: Result = 3
- Failure: Result = 4
- More: Result = 5.
-
-
- The Result field is not used in an adjacency protocol
- message.
-
- Code
- Field gives further information concerning the result in a
- response message. It is mostly used to pass an error code
- in a failure response but can also be used to give further
- information in a success response message or an event
- message. In a request message the code field is not used
- and is set to zero. In an adjacency protocol message the
- Code field is used to determine the function of the
- message.
-
- Transaction Identifier
- Used to associate a request message with its response
- message. For request messages the controller may select any
- transaction identifier. For response messages the
- transaction identifier is set to the value of the
- transaction identifier from the message to which it is a
- response. For event messages the transaction identifier
- should be set to zero. The Transaction Identifier is not
- used, and the field is not present, in the adjacency
- protocol.
-
- The following fields are frequently found in GSMP messages. They are
- defined here to avoid repetition.
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 10]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- Port
- Gives the port number of the switch port to which the
- message applies.
-
- Port Session Number
- Each switch port maintains a Port Session Number assigned
- by the switch. The port session number of a port remains
- unchanged while the port is continuously in the Available
- state and the link status is continuously Up. When a port
- returns to the Available state after it has been
- Unavailable or in any of the Loopback states, or when the
- line status returns to the Up state after it has been Down
- or in Test, or after a power cycle, a new Port Session
- Number must be generated. Port session numbers should be
- assigned using some form of random number.
-
- If the Port Session Number in a request message does not
- match the current Port Session Number for the specified
- port, a failure response message must be returned with the
- Code field indicating, "Invalid port session number." The
- current port session number for a port may be obtained
- using a Port Configuration or an All Ports Configuration
- message.
-
- Any field in a GSMP message that is unused or defined as "reserved"
- must be set to zero by the sender and ignored by the receiver.
-
- It is not an error for a GSMP message to contain additional data
- after the end of the Message Body. This is to support development and
- experimental purposes. However, the maximum transmission unit of the
- GSMP message, as defined by the data link layer encapsulation, must
- not be exceeded.
-
- A success response message must not be sent until the requested
- operation has been successfully completed.
-
- 3.2 Failure Response Messages
-
- A failure response message is formed by returning the request message
- that caused the failure with the Result field in the header
- indicating failure (Result = 4) and the Code field giving the failure
- code. The failure code specifies the reason for the switch being
- unable to satisfy the request message.
-
- If the switch issues a failure response in reply to a request
- message, no change should be made to the state of the switch as a
- result of the message causing the failure. (For request messages that
- contain multiple requests, such as the Delete Branches message, the
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 11]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- failure response message will specify which requests were successful
- and which failed. The successful requests may result in changed
- state.)
-
- If the switch issues a failure response it must choose the most
- specific failure code according to the following precedence:
-
- Invalid Message
-
- Failure specific to the particular message type (failure code
- 16). (The meaning of this failure is dependent upon the
- particular message type and is specified in the text defining
- the message.)
-
- A failure response specified in the text defining the message
- type.
-
- Connection Failures
-
- Virtual Path Connection Failures
-
- Multicast Failures
-
- QoS Failures (QoS failures are specified in Section 9.7.)
-
- General Failures
-
- If multiple failures match in any of the following categories, the
- one that is listed first should be returned. The following failure
- response messages and failure codes are defined:
-
- Invalid Message
-
- 3: The specified request is not implemented on this switch.
- The Message Type field specifies a message that is not
- implemented on the switch or contains a value that is not
- defined in the version of the protocol running in this
- session of GSMP.
-
- 5: One or more of the specified ports does not exist.
- At least one of the ports specified in the message is
- invalid. A port is invalid if it does not exist or if it
- has been removed from the switch.
-
- 4: Invalid Port Session Number.
- The value given in the Port Session Number field does not
- match the current Port Session Number for the specified
- port.
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 12]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- Connection Failures
-
- 8: The specified connection does not exist.
- An operation that expects a connection to be specified,
- either a virtual channel or a virtual path connection,
- cannot locate the specified connection. A virtual channel
- connection is specified by the input port, input VPI, and
- input VCI on which it arrives. A virtual path connection
- is specified by the input port and input VPI on which it
- arrives.
-
- 9: The specified branch does not exist.
- An operation that expects a branch of an existing
- connection to be specified, either a virtual channel or a
- virtual path connection, cannot locate the specified
- branch. A branch of a virtual channel connection is
- specified by the virtual channel connection it belongs to
- and the output port, output VPI, and output VCI on which
- it departs. A branch of a virtual path connection is
- specified by the virtual path connection it belongs to
- and the output port and output VPI on which it departs.
-
- 18: One or more of the specified input VPIs is invalid.
-
- 19: One or more of the specified input VCIs is invalid.
-
- 20: One or more of the specified output VPIs is invalid.
-
- 21: One or more of the specified output VCIs is invalid.
-
- 22: Invalid Class of Service field in a Connection Management
- message.
- The value of the Class of Service field is invalid.
-
- 23: Insufficient resources for QoS Profile.
- The resources requested by the QoS Profile in the Class
- of service field are not available.
-
- Virtual Path Connections
-
- 24: Virtual path switching is not supported on this input port.
-
- 25: Point-to-multipoint virtual path connections are not
- supported on either the requested input port or the
- requested output port.
- One or both of the requested input and output ports is
- unable to support point-to-multipoint virtual path
- connections.
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 13]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- 26: Attempt to add a virtual path connection branch to an
- existing virtual channel connection.
- It is invalid to mix branches switched as virtual channel
- connections with branches switched as virtual path
- connections on the same point-to-multipoint connection.
-
- 27: Attempt to add a virtual channel connection branch to an
- existing virtual path connection.
- It is invalid to mix branches switched as virtual channel
- connections with branches switched as virtual path
- connections on the same point-to-multipoint connection.
-
- Multicast Failures
-
- 10: A branch belonging to the specified point-to-multipoint
- connection is already established on the specified output
- port and the switch cannot support more than a single
- branch of any point-to-multipoint connection on the same
- output port.
-
- 11: The limit on the maximum number of point-to-multipoint
- connections that the switch can support has been reached.
-
- 12: The limit on the maximum number of branches that the
- specified point-to-multipoint connection can support has
- been reached.
-
- 17: Cannot label each output branch of a point-to-multipoint tree
- with a different label.
- Some early designs, and some low-cost ATM switch designs,
- require all output branches of a multicast connection to
- use the same value of VPI/VCI.
-
- 28: Only point-to-point bidirectional connections may be
- established.
- It is an error to attempt to add an additional output
- branch to an existing connection with the bidirectional
- flag set.
-
- 13: Unable to assign the requested VPI/VCI value to the requested
- branch on the specified point-to-multipoint connection.
- Although the requested VPI and VCI are valid, the switch
- is unable to support the request using the specified
- values of VPI and VCI for some reason not covered by the
- above failure responses. This message implies that a
- valid value of VPI or VCI exists that the switch could
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 14]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- support. For example, some switch designs restrict the
- number of distinct VPI/VCI values available to a point-
- to-multipoint connection. (Most switch designs will not
- require this message.)
-
- 14: General problem related to the manner in which point-to-
- multipoint is supported by the switch.
- Use this message if none of the more specific multicast
- failure messages apply. (Most switch designs will not
- require this message.)
-
- General Failures
-
- 2: Invalid request message.
- There is an error in one of the fields of the message not
- covered by a more specific failure message.
-
- 6: One or more of the specified ports is down.
- A port is down if its Port Status is Unavailable.
- Connection Management, Connection State, Port Management,
- and Configuration operations are permitted on a port that
- is Unavailable. Connection Activity and Statistics
- operations are not permitted on a port that is
- Unavailable and will generate this failure response. A
- Port Management message specifying a Take Down function
- on a port already in the Unavailable state will also
- generate this failure response.
-
- 15: Out of resources.
- The switch has exhausted a resource not covered by a more
- specific failure message, for example, running out of
- memory.
-
- 1: Unspecified reason not covered by other failure codes.
- The failure message of last resort.
-
- The following failure response messages are only used by the Label
- Range message.
-
- 29: Cannot support requested VPI range.
-
- 30: Cannot support requested VCI range on all requested VPIs.
-
- The following failure response messages are only used by the Set
- Transmit Cell Rate function of the Port Management
- message.
-
- 31: The transmit cell rate of this output port cannot be changed.
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 15]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- 32: Requested transmit cell rate out of range for this output
- port.
-
-
- 4. Connection Management Messages
-
- Connection management messages are used by the controller to
- establish, delete, modify and verify virtual channel connections and
- virtual path connections across the switch. The Add Branch, Delete
- Tree, and Delete All connection management messages have the
- following format for both request and response messages:
-
- 0 1 2 3
- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Version | Message Type | Result | Code |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Transaction Identifier |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Port Session Number |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Input Port |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- |M|Q|B|C| Input VPI | Input VCI |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Output Port |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- |x x x x| Output VPI | Output VCI |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Number of Branches | Class of Service |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
-
- Input Port
- Identifies a switch input port.
-
- Flags
-
- M: Multicast
- The Multicast flag is used as a hint for point-to-
- multipoint connections in the Add Branch message. It is not
- used in any other connection management messages and in
- these messages it should be set to zero. If set, it
- indicates that the virtual channel connection or the
- virtual path connection is very likely to be a point-to-
- multipoint connection. If zero, it indicates that this
- connection is very likely to be a point-to-point connection
- or is unknown.
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 16]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- The Multicast flag is only used in the Add Branch message
- when establishing the first branch of a new connection. It
- is not required to be set when establishing subsequent
- branches of a point-to-multipoint connection and on such
- connections it should be ignored by the receiver. (On
- receipt of the second and subsequent Add Branch messages
- the receiver knows that this is a point-to-multipoint
- connection.) If it is known that this is the first branch
- of a point-to-multipoint connection this flag should be
- set. If it is unknown, or if it is known that the
- connection is point-to-point this flag should be zero. The
- use of this flag is not mandatory. It may be ignored by the
- switch. If unused the flag should be set to zero. Some
- switches use a different data structure for point-to-
- multipoint connections than for point-to-point connections.
- This flag avoids the switch setting up a point-to-point
- structure for the first branch of a point-to-multipoint
- connection which must immediately be deleted and
- reconfigured as point-to-multipoint when the second branch
- is established.
-
- Q: QoS Profile
- The QoS Profile flag, if set, indicates that the Class of
- Service field contains a QoS Profile Identifier. If this
- flag is zero, it indicates that the Class of Service field
- contains a Priority or a Scheduler Identifier.
-
- B: Bidirectional
- The Bidirectional flag applies only to the Add Branch
- message. In all other Connection Management messages it is
- not used. It may only be used when establishing a point-
- to-point connection. The Bidirectional flag in an Add
- Branch message, if set, requests that two unidirectional
- virtual channels or virtual paths be established, one in
- the forward direction, and one in the reverse direction. It
- is equivalent to two Add Branch messages, one specifying
- the forward direction, and one specifying the reverse
- direction. The forward direction uses the values of Input
- Port, Input VPI, Input VCI, Output Port, Output VPI, and
- Output VCI as specified in the Add Branch message. The
- reverse direction is derived by exchanging the values
- specified in the Input Port, Input VPI, and Input VCI
- fields, with those of the Output Port, Output VPI, and
- Output VCI fields respectively. Thus, a virtual connection
- in the reverse direction arrives at the input port
- specified by the Output Port field, on the VPI/VCI
- specified by the Output VPI and Output VCI fields. It
- departs from the output port specified by the Input Port
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 17]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- field, on the VPI/VCI specified by the Input VPI and Input
- VCI fields.
-
- The Bidirectional flag is simply a convenience to establish
- two unidirectional virtual connections in opposite
- directions between the same two ports, with identical
- VPI/VCIs, using a single Add Branch message. In all future
- messages the two unidirectional virtual connections must be
- handled separately. There is no bidirectional delete
- message. However, a single Delete Branches message with two
- Delete Branch Elements, one for the forward connection and
- one for the reverse, may be used.
-
- C: Congestion Indication
- The Congestion Indication flag, if set, requests that cells
- on this connection be marked if congestion is experienced.
- If this connection passes through a queue that the switch
- considers to be congested, the Congestion Experienced bit
- will be set in the Payload Type field of the cell header of
- all cells on the connection. GSMP does not specify the
- algorithm or any threshold by which the switch decides when
- a queue is congested.
-
- Input VPI
- Identifies an ATM virtual path arriving at the switch input
- port indicated by the Input Port field.
-
- Input VCI
- Identifies an ATM virtual channel arriving on the virtual
- path indicated by the Input VPI field at the switch input
- port indicated by the Input Port field. For virtual path
- connections the Input VCI field is not used.
-
- Output Port
- Identifies a switch output port.
-
- x: Unused
-
- Output VPI
- Identifies an outgoing virtual path departing from the
- switch output port indicated in the Output Port field.
-
- Output VCI
- Identifies an outgoing virtual channel departing on the
- virtual path indicated by the Output VPI field from the
- switch output port indicated in the Output Port field. For
- virtual path connections the Output VCI field is not used.
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 18]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- Number of Branches
- In a success response message and a failure response
- message, gives the number of output branches on a virtual
- channel connection or a virtual path connection after
- completion of the requested operation. (A point-to-point
- connection will have one branch, a point-to-multipoint
- connection will have two or more branches.) If the switch
- is unable to keep track of the number of branches on a
- virtual path connection or a virtual channel connection it
- must respond with the value 0xFFFF meaning: "number of
- branches unknown". This field is not used in the request
- message.
-
- Class of Service
- This field can contain either a QoS Profile Identifier, a
- Priority, or a Scheduler Identifier. If the QoS Profile
- flag in the Flags field is set, the Class of Service field
- contains a QoS Profile. If the QoS Profile flag in the
- Flags field is zero, and the value of the Class of Service
- field is greater than or equal to 0x100, the Class of
- Service field contains a Scheduler Identifier. If the QoS
- Profile flag in the Flags field is zero, and the value of
- the Class of Service field is less than 0x100, the Class of
- Service field contains a Priority. (Values of Scheduler
- Identifier less than 0x100 are interpreted as priorities.)
- The Class of Service field is only used in the Add Branch
- and Move Branch messages.
-
- A QoS Profile Identifier is an opaque 16-bit value. It is
- used to identify a QoS profile in the switch which
- specifies the Quality of Service required by the
- connection. QoS profiles are established by a mechanism
- external to GSMP.
-
- A Scheduler Identifier is an alternative method of
- communicating the QoS requirements of a connection. The
- Scheduler Identifier is defined in Section 9, "Quality of
- Service Messages."
-
- A Priority specifies the priority of the connection for Add
- Branch and Move Branch messages that choose not to use a
- QoS profile, or the QoS capabilities defined in Section 9,
- "Quality of Service Messages." The highest priority is
- numbered zero and the lowest priority is numbered "Q-1"
- where "Q" is the number of priorities that the output port
- can support. The ability to offer different qualities of
- service to different connections based upon their priority
- is assumed to be a property of the output port of the
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 19]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- switch. It is assumed that for virtual path connections or
- virtual channel connections that share the same output
- port, an ATM cell on a connection with a higher priority is
- much more likely to exit the switch before an ATM cell on a
- connection with a lower priority, if they are both in the
- switch at the same time. The number of priorities that each
- output port can support is given in the Port Configuration
- message.
-
- For all connection management messages, except the Delete Branches
- message, the success response message is a copy of the request
- message returned with the Result field indicating success and the
- Number of Branches field indicating the number of branches on the
- connection after completion of the operation. The Code field is not
- used in a connection management success response message.
-
- The failure response message is a copy of the request message
- returned with a Result field indicating failure and the Number of
- Branches field indicating the number of branches on the connection.
-
- Fundamentally, no distinction is made between point-to-point and
- point-to-multipoint connections. By default, the first Add Branch
- message for a particular Input Port, Input VPI, and Input VCI will
- establish a point-to-point virtual connection. The second Add Branch
- message with the same Input Port, Input VPI, and Input VCI fields
- will convert the connection to a point-to-multipoint virtual
- connection with two branches. (For virtual path connections the Input
- VCI is not required.) However, to avoid possible inefficiency with
- some switch designs, the Multicast Flag is provided. If the
- controller knows that a new connection is point-to-multipoint when
- establishing the first branch, it may indicate this in the Multicast
- Flag. Subsequent Add Branch messages with the same Input Port, Input
- VPI, and Input VCI fields will add further branches to the point-to-
- multipoint connection. Use of the Delete Branch message on a point-
- to-multipoint connection with two branches will result in a point-
- to-point connection. However, the switch may structure this
- connection as a point-to-multipoint connection with a single output
- branch if it chooses. (For some switch designs this structure may be
- more convenient.) Use of the Delete Branch message on a point-to-
- point connection will delete the point-to-point connection. There is
- no concept of a connection with zero output branches. All connections
- are unidirectional, one input virtual path or virtual channel to one
- or more output virtual paths or virtual channels.
-
- GSMP supports point-to-point and point-to-multipoint connections. A
- multipoint-to-point connection is specified by establishing multiple
- point-to-point connections each of them specifying the same output
- branch. (An output branch is specified by an output port and output
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 20]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- VPI for a virtual path connection and by an output port, output VPI,
- and output VCI for a virtual channel connection.) A multipoint-to-
- multipoint connection is specified by establishing multiple point-
- to-multipoint trees each of them specifying the same output branches.
-
- The connection management messages apply both to virtual channel
- connections and virtual path connections. The Add Branch and Move
- Branch connection management messages have two Message Types. One
- Message Type indicates that a virtual channel connection is required,
- and the other Message Type indicates that a virtual path connection
- is required. The Delete Branches, Delete Tree, and Delete All
- connection management messages have only a single Message Type
- because they do not need to distinguish between virtual channel
- connections and virtual path connections. For virtual path
- connections, neither Input VCI fields nor Output VCI fields are
- required. They should be set to zero by the sender and ignored by the
- receiver. Virtual channel branches may not be added to an existing
- virtual path connection. Conversely, virtual path branches may not
- be added to an existing virtual channel connection. In the Port
- Configuration message each switch input port may declare whether it
- is capable of supporting virtual path switching (i.e. accepting
- connection management messages requesting virtual path connections).
-
- The connection management messages may be issued regardless of the
- Port Status of the switch port. Connections may be established or
- deleted when a switch port is in the Available, Unavailable, or any
- of the Loopback states. However, all connection state on an input
- port will be deleted when the port returns to the Available state
- from any other state, i.e. when a Port Management message is received
- for that port with the Function field indicating either Bring Up, or
- Reset Input Port.
-
- 4.1 Add Branch Message
-
- The Add Branch message is a connection management message used to
- establish a virtual channel connection or a virtual path connection
- or to add an additional branch to an existing virtual channel
- connection or virtual path connection. It may also be used to check
- the connection state stored in the switch. The connection is
- specified by the Input Port, Input VPI, and Input VCI fields. The
- output branch is specified by the Output Port, Output VPI, and Output
- VCI fields. The quality of service requirements of the connection are
- specified by the Class of Service field. To request a virtual channel
- connection the Virtual Channel Connection (VCC) Add Branch message
- is:
-
- Message Type = 16
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 21]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- To request a virtual path connection the Virtual Path Connection
- (VPC) Add Branch message is:
-
- Message Type = 26
-
- If a VPC Add Branch message is received and the switch input port
- specified by the Input Port field does not support virtual path
- switching, a failure response message must be returned indicating,
- "Virtual path switching is not supported on this input port."
-
- If the virtual channel connection specified by the Input Port, Input
- VPI, and Input VCI fields; or the virtual path connection specified
- by the Input Port and Input VPI fields; does not already exist, it
- must be established with the single output branch specified in the
- request message. If the Bidirectional Flag in the Flags field is set,
- the reverse connection must also be established. The output branch
- should have the QoS attributes specified by the Class of Service
- field.
-
- For the VCC Add Branch message, if a virtual path connection already
- exists on the virtual path specified by the Input Port and Input VPI
- fields, a failure response message must be returned indicating,
- "Attempt to add a virtual channel connection branch to an existing
- virtual path connection." For the VPC Add Branch message, if a
- virtual channel connection already exists on any of the virtual
- channels within the virtual path specified by the Input Port and
- Input VPI fields, a failure response message must be returned
- indicating, "Attempt to add a virtual path connection branch to an
- existing virtual channel connection."
-
- If the virtual channel connection specified by the Input Port, Input
- VPI, and Input VCI fields; or the virtual path connection specified
- by the Input Port and Input VPI fields; already exists, but the
- specified output branch does not, the new output branch must be
- added. The new output branch should have the QoS attributes
- specified by the Class of Service field.
-
- If the virtual channel connection specified by the Input Port, Input
- VPI, and Input VCI fields; or the virtual path connection specified
- by the Input Port and Input VPI fields; already exists and the
- specified output branch also already exists, the QoS attributes of
- the connection, specified by the Class of Service field, if different
- from the request message, should be changed to that in the request
- message. A success response message must be sent if the Result field
- of the request message is "AckAll". This allows the controller to
- periodically reassert the state of a connection or to change its
- priority. If the result field of the request message is
- "NoSuccessAck" a success response message should not be returned.
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 22]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- This may be used to reduce the traffic on the control link for
- messages that are reasserting previously established state. For
- messages that are reasserting previously established state, the
- switch must always check that this state is correctly established in
- the switch hardware (i.e. the actual connection tables used to
- forward cells).
-
- If the output branch specified by the Output Port, Output VPI, and
- Output VCI fields for a virtual channel connection; or the output
- branch specified by the Output Port and Output VPI fields for a
- virtual path connection; is already in use by any connection other
- than that specified by the Input Port, Input VPI, and Input VCI
- fields, then the resulting output branch will have multiple input
- branches. If multiple point-to-point connections share the same
- output branch the result will be a multipoint-to-point connection. If
- multiple point-to-multipoint trees share the same output branches the
- result will be a multipoint-to-multipoint connection.
-
- If the virtual channel connection specified by the Input Port, Input
- VPI, and Input VCI fields, or the virtual path connection specified
- by the Input Port and Input VPI fields, already exists, and the
- Bidirectional Flag in the Flags field is set, a failure response must
- be returned indicating: "Only point-to-point bidirectional
- connections may be established."
-
- It should be noted that different switches support multicast in
- different ways. There will be a limit to the total number of point-
- to-multipoint connections any switch can support, and possibly a
- limit on the maximum number of branches that a point-to-multipoint
- connection may specify. Some switches also impose a limit on the
- number of different VPI/VCI values that may be assigned to the output
- branches of a point-to-multipoint connection. Many switches are
- incapable of supporting more than a single branch of any particular
- point-to-multipoint connection on the same output port. Specific
- failure codes are defined for some of these conditions.
-
- 4.2 Delete Tree Message
-
- The Delete Tree message is a connection management message used to
- delete an entire virtual channel connection or an entire virtual path
- connection. All remaining branches of the connection are deleted. A
- virtual channel connection is specified by the Input Port, Input VPI,
- and Input VCI fields. A virtual path connection is specified by the
- Input Port and Input VPI fields. The Output Port, Output VPI, and
- Output VCI fields are not used in this message. The Delete Tree
- message is:
-
- Message Type = 18
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 23]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- If the Result field of the request message is "AckAll" a success
- response message must be sent upon successful deletion of the
- specified connection. The success message must not be sent until the
- delete operation has been completed and if possible, not until all
- data on the connection, queued for transmission, has been
- transmitted. The Number of Branches field is not used in either the
- request or response messages of the Delete Tree message.
-
- 4.3 Verify Tree Message
-
- The Verify Tree message has been removed from this version of GSMP.
- Its function has been replaced by the Number of Branches field in the
- success response to the Add Branch message which contains the number
- of branches on a virtual channel connection after successful
- completion of an add branch operation.
-
- Message Type = 19 is reserved.
-
- If a request message is received with Message Type = 19 a failure
- response must be returned with the Code field indicating: "The
- specified request is not implemented in this version of the
- protocol."
-
- 4.4 Delete All Message
-
- The Delete All message is a connection management message used to
- delete all connections on a switch input port. All connections that
- arrive at the specified input port must be deleted. On completion of
- the operation all dynamically assigned VPI/VCI values for the
- specified port must be unassigned, i.e. there must be no virtual
- connections established in the VPI/VCI space that GSMP controls on
- this port. The Input VPI, Input VCI, Output Port, Output VPI, and
- Output VCI fields are not used in this message. The Delete All
- message is:
-
- Message Type = 20
-
- If the Result field of the request message is "AckAll" a success
- response message must be sent upon completion of the operation. The
- Number of Branches field is not used in either the request or
- response messages of the Delete All message. The success response
- message must not be sent until the operation has been completed.
-
- The following failure response messages may be returned to a Delete
- All request.
-
- The specified request is not implemented on this switch.
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 24]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- One or more of the specified ports does not exist.
-
- Invalid Port Session Number.
-
- If any field in a Delete All message not covered by the above failure
- codes is invalid, a failure response must be returned indicating:
- "Invalid request message." Else, the delete all operation must be
- completed successfully and a success message returned. No other
- failure messages are permitted.
-
- 4.5 Delete Branches Message
-
- The Delete Branches message is a connection management message used
- to request one or more delete branch operations. Each delete branch
- operation deletes a branch of a virtual channel connection or a
- virtual path connection, or in the case of the last branch of a
- connection, it deletes the connection. The Delete Branches message
- is:
-
- Message Type = 17
-
- The request message has the following format:
-
- 0 1 2 3
- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Version | Message Type | Result | Code |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Transaction Identifier |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Reserved | Number of Elements |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | |
- ~ Delete Branch Elements ~
- | |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
-
- Number of Elements
- Specifies the number of Delete Branch Elements to follow in
- the message. The number of Delete Branch Elements in a
- Delete Branches message must not cause the packet length to
- exceed the maximum transmission unit defined by the
- encapsulation.
-
- Each Delete Branch Element specifies an output branch to be deleted
- and has the following structure:
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 25]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Port Session Number |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Input Port |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Error | Input VPI | Input VCI |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Output Port |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- |x x x x| Output VPI | Output VCI |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
-
- Error
- Is used to return a failure code indicating the reason for
- the failure of a specific Delete Branch Element in a Delete
- Branches failure response message. The Error field is not
- used in the request message and must be set to zero. A
- value of zero is used to indicate that the delete operation
- specified by this Delete Branch Element was successful.
- Values for the other failure codes are specified in Section
- 3.2, "Failure Response Messages."
-
- All other fields of the Delete Branch Element have the same
- definition as specified for the other connection management
- messages.
-
- In each Delete Branch Element, either a virtual channel connection is
- specified by the Input Port, Input VPI, and Input VCI fields; or a
- virtual path connection is specified by the Input Port and Input VPI
- fields. The specific branch to be deleted is indicated by the Output
- Port, Output VPI, and Output VCI fields for virtual channel
- connections and by the Output Port and Output VPI for virtual path
- connections.
-
- If the Result field of the Delete Branches request message is
- "AckAll" a success response message must be sent upon successful
- deletion of the branches specified by all of the Delete Branch
- Elements. The success response message must not be sent until all of
- the delete branch operations have been completed. The success
- response message is only sent if all of the requested delete branch
- operations were successful. No Delete Branch Elements are returned in
- a Delete Branches success response message and the Number of Elements
- field must be set to zero.
-
- If there is a failure in any of the Delete Branch Elements a Delete
- Branches failure response message must be returned. The Delete
- Branches failure response message is a copy of the request message
- with the Code field of the entire message set to, "Failure specific
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 26]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- to the particular message type," and the Error field of each Delete
- Branch Element indicating the result of each requested delete
- operation. A failure in any of the Delete Branch Elements must not
- interfere with the processing of any other Delete Branch Elements.
-
- 4.6 Move Branch Message
-
- The Move Branch message is used to move a branch of an existing
- connection from its current output port VPI/VCI to a new output port
- VPI/VCI in a single atomic transaction. This operation occurs
- frequently in IP switching, every time a flow is switched from hop-
- by-hop forwarding to a dedicated virtual channel. The Move Branch
- connection management message has the following format for both
- request and response messages:
-
- 0 1 2 3
- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Version | Message Type | Result | Code |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Transaction Identifier |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Port Session Number |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Input Port |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Flags | Input VPI | Input VCI |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Old Output Port |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- |x x x x| Old Output VPI | Old Output VCI |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | New Output Port |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- |x x x x| New Output VPI | New Output VCI |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Number of Branches | Class of Service |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
-
- The VCC Move Branch message is a connection management message used
- to move a single output branch of a virtual channel connection from
- its current output port, output VPI, and output VCI, to a new output
- port, output VPI, and output VCI on the same virtual channel
- connection. None of the other output branches are modified. When the
- operation is complete the original output VPI/VCI on the original
- output port will be deleted from the connection. The VCC Move Branch
- message is:
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 27]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- Message Type = 22
-
- For the VCC Move Branch message, if the virtual channel connection
- specified by the Input Port, Input VPI, and Input VCI fields already
- exists, and the output branch specified by the Old Output Port, Old
- Output VPI, and Old Output VCI fields exists as a branch on that
- connection, the output branch specified by the New Output Port, New
- Output VPI, and New Output VCI fields is added to the connection and
- the branch specified by the Old Output Port, Old Output VPI, and Old
- Output VCI fields is deleted. If the Result field of the request
- message is "AckAll" a success response message must be sent upon
- successful completion of the operation. The success response message
- must not be sent until the Move Branch operation has been completed.
-
- For the VCC Move Branch message, if the virtual channel connection
- specified by the Input Port, Input VPI, and Input VCI fields already
- exists, but the output branch specified by the Old Output Port, Old
- Output VPI, and Old Output VCI fields does not exist as a branch on
- that connection, a failure response must be returned with the Code
- field indicating, "The specified branch does not exist."
-
- The VPC Move Branch message is a connection management message used
- to move a single output branch of a virtual path connection from its
- current output port and output VPI, to a new output port and output
- VPI on the same virtual channel connection. None of the other output
- branches are modified. When the operation is complete the original
- output VPI on the original output port will be deleted from the
- connection. The VPC Move Branch message is:
-
- Message Type = 27
-
- For the VPC Move Branch message, if the virtual path connection
- specified by the Input Port and Input VPI fields already exists, and
- the output branch specified by the Old Output Port and Old Output VPI
- fields exists as a branch on that connection, the output branch
- specified by the New Output Port and New Output VPI fields is added
- to the connection and the branch specified by the Old Output Port and
- Old Output VPI fields is deleted. If the Result field of the request
- message is "AckAll" a success response message must be sent upon
- successful completion of the operation. The success response message
- must not be sent until the Move Branch operation has been completed.
-
- For the VPC Move Branch message, if the virtual path connection
- specified by the Input Port and Input VPI fields already exists, but
- the output branch specified by the Old Output Port and Old Output VPI
- fields does not exist as a branch on that connection, a failure
- response must be returned with the Code field indicating, "The
- specified branch does not exist."
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 28]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- If the virtual channel connection specified by the Input Port, Input
- VPI, and Input VCI fields; or the virtual path connection specified
- by the Input Port and Input VPI fields; does not exist, a failure
- response must be returned with the Code field indicating, "The
- specified connection does not exist."
-
- If the output branch specified by the New Output Port, New Output
- VPI, and New Output VCI fields for a virtual channel connection; or
- the output branch specified by the New Output Port and New Output VPI
- fields for a virtual path connection; is already in use by any
- connection other than that specified by the Input Port, Input VPI,
- and Input VCI fields then the resulting output branch will have
- multiple input branches. If multiple point-to-point connections share
- the same output branch the result will be a multipoint-to-point
- connection. If multiple point-to-multipoint trees share the same
- output branches the result will be a multipoint-to-multipoint
- connection.
-
-
- 5. Port Management Messages
-
- 5.1 Port Management Message
-
- The Port Management message allows a port to be brought into service,
- taken out of service, looped back, reset, or the transmit cell rate
- changed. Only the Bring Up and the Reset Input Port functions change
- the connection state (established connections) on the input port.
- Only the Bring Up function changes the value of the Port Session
- Number. If the Result field of the request message is "AckAll" a
- success response message must be sent upon successful completion of
- the operation. The success response message must not be sent until
- the operation has been completed. The Port Management Message is:
-
- Message Type = 32
-
- The Port Management message has the following format for the request
- and success response messages:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 29]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- 0 1 2 3
- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Version | Message Type | Result | Code |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Transaction Identifier |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Port |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Port Session Number |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Event Sequence Number |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Event Flags | Duration | Function |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Transmit Cell Rate |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
-
- Event Sequence Number
- In the success response message gives the current value of
- the Event Sequence Number of the switch port indicated by
- the Port field. The Event Sequence Number is set to zero
- when the port is initialized. It is incremented by one each
- time the port detects an asynchronous event that the switch
- would normally report via an Event message. If the Event
- Sequence Number in the success response differs from the
- Event Sequence Number of the most recent Event message
- received for that port, events have occurred that were not
- reported via an Event message. This is most likely to be
- due to the flow control that restricts the rate at which a
- switch can send Event messages for each port. In the
- request message this field is not used.
-
- Event Flags
- Field in the request message is used to reset the Event
- Flags in the switch port indicated by the Port field. Each
- Event Flag in a switch port corresponds to a type of Event
- message. When a switch port sends an Event message it sets
- the corresponding Event Flag on that port. The port is not
- permitted to send another Event message of the same type
- until the Event Flag has been reset. If the Function field
- in the request message is set to "Reset Event Flags," for
- each bit that is set in the Event Flags field, the
- corresponding Event Flag in the switch port is reset.
-
- The Event Flags field is only used in a request message
- with the Function field set to "Reset Event Flags." For all
- other values of the Function field, the Event Flags field
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 30]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- is not used. In the success response message the Event
- Flags field must be set to the current value of the Event
- Flags for the port, after the completion of the operation
- specified by the request message, for all values of the
- Function field. Setting the Event Flags field to all zeros
- in a "Reset Event Flags" request message allows the
- controller to obtain the current state of the Event Flags
- and the current Event Sequence Number of the port without
- changing the state of the Event Flags.
-
- The correspondence between the types of Event message and
- the bits of the Event Flags field is as follows:
-
- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- |U|D|I|N|Z|x x x|
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
-
- U: Port Up Bit 0, (most significant bit)
- D: Port Down Bit 1,
- I: Invalid VPI/VCI Bit 2,
- N: New Port Bit 3,
- Z: Dead Port Bit 4,
- x: Unused Bits 5--7.
-
- Duration
- Is the length of time, in seconds, that any of the loopback
- states remain in operation. When the duration has expired
- the port will automatically be returned to service. If
- another Port Management message is received for the same
- port before the duration has expired, the loopback will
- continue to remain in operation for the length of time
- specified by the Duration field in the new message. The
- Duration field is only used in request messages with the
- Function field set to Internal Loopback, External Loopback,
- or Bothway Loopback.
-
- Function
- Specifies the action to be taken. The specified action will
- be taken regardless of the current status of the port
- (Available, Unavailable, or any Loopback state). If the
- specified function requires a new Port Session Number to be
- generated, the new Port Session Number must be returned in
- the success response message. The defined values of the
- Function field are:
-
- Bring Up:
- Function = 1. Bring the port into service. All
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 31]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- connections that arrive at the specified input port
- must be deleted and a new Port Session Number must be
- selected using some form of random number. On
- completion of the operation all dynamically assigned
- VPI/VCI values for the specified input port must be
- unassigned, i.e. no virtual connections will be
- established in the VPI/VCI space that GSMP controls on
- this input port. The Port Status of the port
- afterwards will be Available.
-
- Take Down:
- Function = 2. Take the port out of service. Any cells
- received at this port will be discarded. No cells will
- be transmitted from this port. The Port Status of the
- port afterwards will be Unavailable.
-
- The behavior is undefined if the port is taken down
- over which the GSMP session that controls the switch
- is running. (In this case the most probable behavior
- would be for the switch either to ignore the message
- or to terminate the current GSMP session and to
- initiate another session, possibly with the backup
- controller, if any.) The correct method to reset the
- link over which GSMP is running is to issue an RSTACK
- message in the adjacency protocol.
-
- Internal Loopback:
- Function = 3. Cells arriving at the output port from
- the switch fabric are looped through to the input port
- to return to the switch fabric. All of the ATM
- functions of the input port above the physical layer,
- e.g. header translation, are performed upon the looped
- back cells. The Port Status of the port afterwards
- will be Internal Loopback.
-
- External Loopback:
- Function = 4. Cells arriving at the input port from
- the external communications link are immediately
- looped back to the communications link at the physical
- layer without entering the input port. None of the ATM
- functions of the input port above the physical layer
- are performed upon the looped back cells. The Port
- Status of the port afterwards will be External
- Loopback.
-
- Bothway Loopback:
- Function = 5. Both internal and external loopback are
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 32]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- performed. The Port Status of the port afterwards will
- be Bothway Loopback.
-
- Reset Input Port:
- Function = 6. All connections that arrive at the
- specified input port must be deleted and the input and
- output port hardware re-initialized. On completion of
- the operation all dynamically assigned VPI/VCI values
- for the specified input port must be unassigned, i.e.
- no virtual connections will be established in the
- VPI/VCI space that GSMP controls on this input port.
- The range of VPIs and VCIs that may be controlled by
- GSMP on this port will be set to the default values
- specified in the Port Configuration message. The
- transmit cell rate of the output port must be set to
- its default value. The Port Session Number is not
- changed by the Reset Input Port function. The Port
- Status of the port afterwards will be Unavailable.
-
- Reset Event Flags:
- Function = 7. For each bit that is set in the Event
- Flags field, the corresponding Event Flag in the
- switch port must be reset. The Port Status of the port
- is not changed by this function.
-
- Set Transmit Cell Rate:
- Function = 8. Sets the transmit cell rate of the
- output port as close as possible to the rate specified
- in the Transmit Cell Rate field. In the success
- response message the Transmit Cell Rate must indicate
- the actual transmit cell rate of the output port. If
- the transmit cell rate of the requested output port
- cannot be changed, a failure response must be returned
- with the Code field indicating: "The transmit cell
- rate of this output port cannot be changed." If the
- transmit cell rate of the requested output port can be
- changed, but the value of the Transmit Cell Rate field
- is beyond the range of acceptable values, a failure
- response must be returned with the Code field
- indicating: "Requested transmit cell rate out of range
- for this output port." In the failure response message
- the Transmit Cell Rate must contain the same value as
- contained in the request message that caused the
- failure. The transmit cell rate of the output port is
- not changed by the Bring Up, Take Down, or any of the
- Loopback functions. It is returned to the default
- value by the Reset Input Port function.
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 33]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- Transmit Cell Rate
- This field is only used in request and success response
- messages with the Function field set to "Set Transmit Cell
- Rate." It is used to set the output cell rate of the output
- port. It is specified in cells/s. If the Transmit Cell Rate
- field contains the value 0xFFFFFFFF the transmit cell rate
- of the output port should be set to the highest valid
- value.
-
- 5.2. Label Range Message
-
- The default label range, Min VPI to Max VPI and Min VCI to Max VCI,
- is specified for each port by the Port Configuration or the All Ports
- Configuration messages. When the protocol is initialized, before the
- transmission of any Label Range messages, the label range of each
- port will be set to the default label range. (The default label range
- is dependent upon the switch design and configuration and is not
- specified by the GSMP protocol.) The Label Range message allows the
- range of VPIs supported by a specified port, or the range of VCIs
- supported by a specified VPI on a specified port, to be changed.
- Each switch port must declare whether it supports the Label Range
- message in the Port Configuration or the All Ports Configuration
- messages. The Label Range message is:
-
- Message Type = 33
-
- The Label Range message has the following format for the request and
- success response messages:
-
- 0 1 2 3
- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Version | Message Type | Result | Code |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Transaction Identifier |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Port |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Port Session Number |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- |Q|V|x x| Min VPI |x x x x| Max VPI |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Min VCI | Max VCI |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Remaining VPIs | Remaining VCIs |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 34]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- Flags
-
- Q: Query
- If the Query flag is set in a request message, the switch
- must respond with the current range of valid VPIs, or the
- current range of valid VCIs on a specified VPI, according
- to the VPI/VCI flag. The current label range is not changed
- by a request message with the Query flag set. If the Query
- flag is zero, the message is requesting a label change
- operation.
-
- V: VPI/VCI
- If the VPI/VCI flag is set, the message refers to a range
- of VPIs only. The Min VCI and Max VCI fields are unused. If
- the VPI/VCI flag is zero the message refers to a range of
- VCIs on either one VPI or on a range of VPIs.
-
- x: Unused
-
- Min VPI
- Max VPI
- Specify a range of VPI values, Min VPI to Max VPI
- inclusive. A single VPI may be specified with a Min VPI
- and a Max VPI having the same value. In a request message,
- if the value of the Max VPI field is less than or equal to
- the value of the Min VPI field, the requested range is a
- single VPI with a value equal to the Min VPI field. Zero is
- a valid value. In a request message, if the Query flag is
- set, and the VPI/VCI flag is zero, the Max VPI field
- specifies a single VPI and the Min VPI field is not used.
- The maximum valid value of these fields for both request
- and response messages is 0xFFF.
-
- Min VCI
- Max VCI
- Specify a range of VCI values, Min VCI to Max VCI
- inclusive. A single VCI may be specified with a Min VCI
- and a Max VCI having the same value. In a request message,
- if the value of the Max VCI field is less than or equal to
- the value of the Min VCI field, the requested range is a
- single VCI with a value equal to the Min VCI field. Zero is
- a valid value. (However, VPI=0, VCI=0 is not available as
- a virtual channel connection as it is used as a special
- value in ATM to indicate an unassigned cell.)
-
- Remaining VPIs
- Remaining VCIs
- These fields are unused in the request message. In the
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 35]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- success response message and in the failure response
- message these fields give the maximum number of remaining
- VPIs and VCIs that could be requested for allocation on the
- specified port (after completion of the requested operation
- in the case of the success response). It gives the switch
- controller an idea of how many VPIs and VCIs it could
- request. The number given is the maximum possible given the
- constraints of the switch hardware. There is no implication
- that this number of VPIs and VCIs is available to every
- switch port.
-
- If the Query flag and the VPI/VCI flag are set in the request
- message, the switch must reply with a success response message
- containing the current range of valid VPIs that are supported by the
- port. The Min VPI and Max VPI fields are not used in the request
- message.
-
- If the Query flag is set and the VPI/VCI flag is zero in the request
- message, the switch must reply with a success response message
- containing the current range of valid VCIs that are supported by the
- VPI specified by the Max VPI field. If the requested VPI is invalid,
- a failure response must be returned indicating: "One or more of the
- specified input VPIs is invalid." The Min VPI field is not used in
- either the request or success response messages.
-
- If the Query flag is zero and the VPI/VCI flag is set in the request
- message, the Min VPI and Max VPI fields specify the new range of VPIs
- to be allocated to the input port specified by the Port field.
- Whatever the range of VPIs previously allocated to this port it
- should be increased or decreased to the specified value.
-
- If the Query flag and the VPI/VCI flag are zero in the request
- message, the Min VCI and Max VCI fields specify the range of VCIs to
- be allocated to each of the VPIs specified by the VPI range.
- Whatever the range of VCIs previously allocated to each of the VPIs
- within the specified VPI range on this port, it should be increased
- or decreased to the specified value. The allocated VCI range must be
- the same on each of the VPIs within the specified VPI range.
-
- The success response to a Label Range message requesting a change of
- label range is a copy of the request message with the Remaining VPIs
- and Remaining VCIs fields updated to the new values after the Label
- Range operation.
-
- If the switch is unable to satisfy a request to change the VPI range,
- it must return a failure response message with the Code field set to
- "Cannot support requested VPI range." In this failure response
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 36]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- message the switch must use the Min VPI and Max VPI fields to suggest
- a VPI range that it would be able to satisfy.
-
- If the switch is unable to satisfy a request to change the VCI range
- on all VPIs within the requested VPI range, it must return a failure
- response message with the Code field set to "Cannot support requested
- VCI range on all requested VPIs." In this failure response message
- the switch must use the Min VPI, Max VPI, Min VCI, and Max VCI fields
- to suggest a VPI and VCI range that it would be able to satisfy.
-
- In all other failure response messages for the label range operation
- the switch must return the values of Min VPI, Max VPI, Min VCI, and
- Max VCI from the request message.
-
- While switches can typically support all 256 or 4096 VPIs the VCI
- range that can be supported is often more constrained. Often the Min
- VCI must be 0 or 32. Typically all VCIs within a particular VPI must
- be contiguous. The hint in the failure response message allows the
- switch to suggest a label range that it could satisfy in view of its
- particular architecture.
-
- While the Label Range message is defined to specify both a range of
- VPIs and a range of VCIs within each VPI, the most likely use is to
- change either the VPI range or the range of VCIs within a single VPI.
- It is possible for a VPI to be valid but to be allocated no valid
- VCIs. Such a VPI could be used for a virtual path connection but to
- support virtual channel connections it would need to be allocated a
- range of VCIs.
-
- A Label Range request message may be issued regardless of the Port
- Status or the Line Status of the target switch port. If the Port
- field of the request message contains an invalid port (a port that
- does not exist or a port that has been removed from the switch) a
- failure response message must be returned with the Code field set to,
- "One or more of the specified ports does not exist."
-
-
- 6. State and Statistics Messages
-
- The state and statistics messages permit the controller to request
- the values of various hardware counters associated with the switch
- input and output ports, virtual path connections, virtual channel
- connections, and QoS Classes. They also permit the controller to
- request the connection state of a switch input port. The Connection
- Activity message is used to determine whether one or more specific
- virtual channel connections or virtual path connections have recently
- been carrying traffic. The Statistics message is used to query the
- various port, connection, and QoS class traffic and error counters.
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 37]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- The Report Connection State message is used to request an input port
- to report the connection state for a single virtual channel
- connection, a single virtual path connection, or for the entire input
- port.
-
- 6.1 Connection Activity Message
-
- The Connection Activity message is used to determine whether one or
- more specific virtual channel connections or virtual path connections
- have recently been carrying traffic. The Connection Activity message
- contains one or more Activity Records. Each Activity Record is used
- to request and return activity information concerning a single
- virtual channel connection or virtual path connection. Each virtual
- channel connection is specified by its input port, input VPI, and
- input VCI. Each virtual path connection is specified by its input
- port and input VPI. These are specified in the Input Port, Input VPI,
- and Input VCI fields of each Activity Record. Two forms of activity
- detection are supported. If the switch supports per connection
- traffic accounting, the current value of the traffic counter for each
- specified virtual channel connection or virtual path connection must
- be returned. The units of traffic counted are not specified but will
- typically be either cells or frames. The controller must compare the
- traffic counts returned in the message with previous values for each
- of the specified connections to determine whether each connection has
- been active in the intervening period. If the switch does not
- support per connection traffic accounting, but is capable of
- detecting per connection activity by some other unspecified means,
- the result may be indicated for each connection using the Flags
- field. The Connection Activity message is:
-
- Message Type = 48
-
- The Connection Activity request and success response messages have
- the following format:
-
- 0 1 2 3
- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Version | Message Type | Result | Code |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Transaction Identifier |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Number of Records | Reserved |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | |
- ~ Activity Records ~
- | |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 38]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- Number of Records
- Field specifies the number of Activity Records to follow.
- The number of Connection Activity records in a single
- Connection Activity message must not cause the packet
- length to exceed the maximum transmission unit defined by
- the encapsulation.
-
- Each Activity Record has the following format:
-
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Input Port |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- |V|C|A|x| Input VPI | Input VCI |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | |
- + Traffic Count +
- | |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
-
- Input Port
- Identifies the port number of the input port on which the
- connection of interest arrives in order to identify the
- connection (regardless of whether the traffic count for the
- connection is maintained on the input port or the output
- port).
-
- Input VPI
- Input VCI
- Fields identify the specific virtual path connection or
- virtual channel connection for which statistics are being
- requested. For a virtual path connection the Input VCI
- field is not used.
-
- Flags
-
- V: Valid Record
- In the success response message the Valid Record flag is
- used to indicate an invalid Activity Record. The flag must
- be zero if any of the fields in this Activity Record are
- invalid, if the input port specified by the Input Port
- field does not exist, or if the specified connection does
- not exist. If the Valid Record flag is zero in a success
- response message, the Counter flag, the Activity flag, and
- the VC Traffic Count field are undefined. If the Valid
- Record flag is set, the Activity Record is valid, and the
- Counter and Activity flags are valid. The Valid Record flag
- is not used in the request message.
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 39]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- C: Counter
- In a success response message, if the Valid Record flag is
- set, the Counter flag, if zero, indicates that the value in
- the VC Traffic Count field is valid. If set, it indicates
- that the value in the Activity flag is valid. The Counter
- flag is not used in the request message.
-
- A: Activity
- In a success response message, if the Valid Record and
- Counter flags are set, the Activity flag, if set, indicates
- that there has been some activity on this connection since
- the last Connection Activity message for this connection.
- If zero, it indicates that there has been no activity on
- this connection since the last Connection Activity message
- for this connection. The Activity flag is not used in the
- request message.
-
- x: Unused
-
- Traffic Count
- Field is not used in the request message. In the success
- response message, if the switch supports per connection
- traffic counting, the Traffic Count field must be set to
- the value of a free running, connection specific, 64-bit
- traffic counter counting traffic flowing across the
- specified connection. The value of the traffic counter is
- not modified by reading it. If per connection traffic
- counting is supported, the switch must report the
- Connection Activity result using the traffic count rather
- than using the Activity flag.
-
- The format of the failure response is the same as the request message
- with the Number of Records field set to zero and no VC Activity
- records returned in the message. If the switch is incapable of
- detecting per connection activity, a failure response must be
- returned indicating, "The specified request is not implemented on
- this switch."
-
- 6.2 Statistics Messages
-
- The Statistics messages are used to query the various port,
- connection, and QoS class traffic and error counters.
-
- The Statistics request messages have the following format:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 40]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- 0 1 2 3
- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Version | Message Type | Result | Code |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Transaction Identifier |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Port |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | zero | VPI | VCI |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | QoS Class Identifier |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
-
- VPI
- VCI
- Fields identify the specific virtual path connection or
- virtual channel connection for which statistics are being
- requested. For a virtual path connection the Input VCI
- field is not used. For requests that do not require a
- virtual path connection or virtual channel connection to be
- specified, the VPI and VCI fields are not used.
-
- QoS Class Identifier
- Field identifies the QoS class for which statistics are
- being requested. This field is only used if the QoS Class
- Establishment message defined in section 9.4 is
- implemented.
-
- The success response for the Statistics message has the following
- format:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 41]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- 0 1 2 3
- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Version | Message Type | Result | Code |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Transaction Identifier |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Port |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | zero | VPI | VCI |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | QoS Class Identifier |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | |
- + Input Cell Count +
- | |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | |
- + Input Frame Count +
- | |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | |
- + Input Cell Discard Count +
- | |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | |
- + Input Frame Discard Count +
- | |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | |
- + Input HEC Error Count +
- | |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | |
- + Input Invalid VPI/VCI Count +
- | |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | |
- + Output Cell Count +
- | |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | |
- + Output Frame Count +
- | |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | |
- + Output Cell Discard Count +
- | |
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 42]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | |
- + Output Frame Discard Count +
- | |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
-
- Port
- VPI/VCI
- QoS Class Identifier
- Fields are the same as those of the request message.
-
- Input Cell Count
- Output Cell Count
- Give the value of a free running 64-bit counter counting
- cells arriving at the input or departing from the output
- respectively.
-
- Input Frame Count
- Output Frame Count
- Give the value of a free running 64-bit counter counting
- frames (packets) arriving at the input or departing from
- the output respectively.
-
- Input Cell Discard Count
- Output Cell Discard Count
- Give the value of a free running 64-bit counter counting
- cells discarded due to queue overflow on an input port or
- on an output port respectively.
-
- Input Frame Discard Count
- Output Frame Discard Count
- Give the value of a free running 64-bit counter counting
- frames discarded due to congestion on an input port or on
- an output port respectively.
-
- HEC Error Count
- Gives the value of a free running 64-bit counter counting
- cells discarded due to header checksum errors on arrival at
- an input port.
-
- Invalid VPI/VCI Count
- Gives the value of a free running 64-bit counter counting
- cells discarded because their VPI/VCI is invalid on arrival
- at an input port. For a virtual channel connection an
- incoming VPI/VCI is invalid if no connection is currently
- established having that value of VPI/VCI. For a virtual
- path connection an incoming VPI is invalid if no connection
- is currently established having that value of VPI.
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 43]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- 6.2.1 Port Statistics Message
-
- The Port Statistics message requests the statistics for the switch
- port specified in the Port field. The contents of the VPI/VCI and the
- QoS Class Identifier fields in the Port Statistics request message
- are ignored. All of the count fields in the success response message
- refer to per-port counts regardless of the connection or QoS class to
- which the cells belong. Any of the count fields in the success
- response message not supported by the port must be set to zero. The
- Port Statistics message is:
-
- Message Type = 49
-
- 6.2.2 Connection Statistics Message
-
- The Connection Statistics message requests the statistics for the
- virtual channel connection specified in the VPI/VCI field, or the
- virtual path connection specified in the VPI field, that arrives on
- the switch input port specified in the Port field, regardless of the
- QoS class to which the cells belong. All of the count fields in the
- success response message refer only to the specified connection. The
- HEC Error Count and Invalid VPI/VCI Count fields are not connection
- specific and must be set to zero. Any of the other count fields not
- supported on a per connection basis must be set to zero in the
- success response message. The Connection Statistics message is:
-
- Message Type = 50
-
- 6.2.3 QoS Class Statistics Message
-
- The QoS Class Statistics message requests the statistics for the QoS
- class specified by the QoS Class Identifier field that arrives on the
- switch input port specified in the Port field, regardless of the
- connection to which the cells belong. The QoS Statistics message is
- only used if the QoS Class Establishment message defined in section
- 9.4 is implemented. The contents of the VPI/VCI fields in the QoS
- Class Statistics request message are ignored. All of the count fields
- in the success response message refer only to the specified QoS
- class. The HEC Error Count and Invalid VPI/VCI Count fields are not
- specific to a QoS class and must be set to zero. Any of the other
- count fields not supported on a per QoS class basis must be set to
- zero in the success response message. The QoS Class Statistics
- message is:
-
- Message Type = 51
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 44]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- 6.3 Report Connection State Message
-
- The Report Connection State message is used to request an input port
- to report the connection state for a single virtual channel
- connection, a single virtual path connection, or for the entire input
- port. The Report Connection State message is:
-
- Message Type = 52
-
- The Report Connection State request message has the following format:
-
- 0 1 2 3
- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Version | Message Type | Result | Code |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Transaction Identifier |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Input Port |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- |A|V|x x| Input VPI | Input VCI |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
-
- Input Port
- Identifies the port number of the input port for which the
- connection state is being requested.
-
- Flags
-
- A: All Connections
- If the All Connections flag is set, the message requests
- the connection state for all virtual path connections and
- virtual channel connections that arrive at the input port
- specified by the Input Port field. In this case the Input
- VPI and Input VCI fields and the VPI/VCI flag are unused.
-
- V: VPI/VCI
- If the All Connections flag is zero and the VPI/VCI flag is
- set, the message requests the connection state for the
- virtual path connection that arrives at the input port
- specified by the Input Port and Input VPI fields. If the
- specified Input VPI identifies a virtual path connection
- (i.e. a single switched virtual path) the state for that
- connection is requested. If the specified Input VPI
- identifies a virtual path containing virtual channel
- connections, the message requests the connection state for
- all virtual channel connections that belong to the
- specified virtual path. The Input VCI field is not used.
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 45]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- If the All Connections flag is zero and the VPI/VCI flag is
- also zero, the message requests the connection state for
- the virtual channel connection that arrives at the input
- port specified by the Port, Input VPI and Input VCI fields.
-
- x: Unused.
-
- Input VPI
- Input VCI
- Fields identify the specific virtual path connection, the
- specific virtual path, or the specific virtual channel
- connection for which connection state is being requested.
- For a virtual path connection (switched as a single virtual
- path connection) or a virtual path (switched as one or more
- virtual channel connections within the virtual path) the
- Input VCI field is not used. For requests that do not
- require a virtual path connection or virtual channel
- connection to be specified, the Input VPI and Input VCI
- fields are not used.
-
- The Report Connection State success response message has the
- following format:
-
- 0 1 2 3
- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Version | Message Type | Result | Code |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Transaction Identifier |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Input Port |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Sequence Number |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | |
- ~ Connection Records ~
- | |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
-
- Input Port
- Is the same as the Input Port field in the request message.
- It identifies the port number of the input port for which
- the connection state is being reported.
-
- Sequence Number
- In the case that the requested connection state cannot be
- reported in a single success response message, each
- successive success response message in reply to the same
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 46]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- request message must increment the Sequence Number. The
- Sequence Number of the first success response message, in
- response to a new request message, must be zero.
-
- Connection Records
- Each success response message must contain one or more
- Connection Records. Each Connection Record specifies a
- single point-to-point or point-to-multipoint virtual path
- connection or virtual channel connection. The number of
- Connection Records in a single Report Connection State
- success response must not cause the packet length to exceed
- the maximum transmission unit defined by the encapsulation.
- If the requested connection state cannot be reported in a
- single success response message, multiple success response
- messages must be sent. All success response messages that
- are sent in response to the same request message must have
- the same Input Port and Transaction Identifier fields as
- the request message. A single Connection Record must not be
- split across multiple success response messages. The More
- flag of the last Connection Record in a success response
- message indicates whether the response to the request has
- been completed or whether one or more further success
- response messages should be expected in response to the
- same request message.
-
- Each Connection Record has the following format:
-
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- |A|V|P|M| Input VPI | Input VCI |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | |
- ~ Output Branch Records ~
- | |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
-
- Flags
-
- A: All Connections
- V: VPI/VCI
- For the first Connection Record in each success response
- message the All Connections and the VPI/VCI flags must be
- the same as those of the request message. For successive
- Connection Records in the same success response message
- these flags are not used.
-
- P: VPC
- The VPC flag, if set, indicates that the Connection Record
- refers to a virtual path connection. If zero, it indicates
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 47]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- that the Connection Record refers to a virtual channel
- connection.
-
- M: More
- If the More flag is set, it indicates that another
- Connection Record, in response to the same request message,
- will follow either in the same success response message or
- in a successive success response message. If the More flag
- is zero it indicates that this is the last Connection
- record in this success response message and that no further
- success response messages will be sent in response to the
- current request message. It indicates that the response to
- the request message is now complete.
-
- Input VPI
- Input VCI
- The input VPI and VCI of the connection specified in this
- Connection Record. If this Connection Record specifies a
- virtual path connection (the VPC flag is set) the Input VCI
- field is unused.
-
- Output Branch Records
- Each Connection Record must contain one or more Output
- Branch Records. Each Output Branch Record specifies a
- single output branch belonging to the connection identified
- by the Input VPI and Input VCI fields of the Connection
- Record. A point-to-point connection will require only a
- single Output Branch Record. A point-to-multipoint
- connection will require multiple Output Branch Records. The
- last Output Branch Record of each Connection Record is
- indicated by the Last Branch flag of the Output Branch
- Record. If a point-to-multipoint connection has more output
- branches than can fit in a single Connection Record
- contained within a single success response message, that
- connection may be reported using multiple Connection
- Records in multiple success response messages.
-
- Each Output Branch Record has the following format:
-
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Output Port |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- |L|x x x| Output VPI | Output VCI |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
-
- Output Port
- The output port of the switch to which this output branch
- is routed.
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 48]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- Flags
-
- L: Last Branch
- The Last Branch flag, if set, indicates that this is the
- last Output Branch Record of this Connection Record. If
- zero, it indicates that one or more further Output Branch
- Records are to follow. If this is the last Output Branch
- Record in the message and the Last Branch flag is zero,
- further output branches belonging to the same connection
- will be given in another Connection Record. This Connection
- Record will be the first Connection Record in the next
- success response message. This Connection Record must have
- the same Input VPI and Input VCI values as the current
- Connection Record.
-
- x: Unused.
-
- Output VPI
- Output VCI
- The output VPI and VCI of the output branch specified in
- this Output Branch Record. If this Output Branch Record is
- part of a Connection Record that specifies a virtual path
- connection (the VPC flag is set) the Output VCI field is
- unused.
-
- A Report Connection State request message may be issued regardless of
- the Port Status or the Line Status of the target switch port.
-
- If the Input Port of the request message is valid, and the All
- Connections flag is set, but there are no connections established on
- that port, a failure response message must be returned with the code
- field set to, "Failure specific to the particular message type." For
- the Report Connection State message, this failure code indicates that
- no connections matching the request message were found. This failure
- message should also be returned if the Input Port of the request
- message is valid, the All Connections flag is zero, and no
- connections are found on that port matching the specified virtual
- path connection, virtual path, or virtual channel connection.
-
-
- 7. Configuration Messages
-
- The configuration messages permit the controller to discover the
- capabilities of the switch. Three configuration request messages have
- been defined: Switch, Port, and All Ports.
-
- All configuration request messages have the following format:
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 49]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- 0 1 2 3
- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Version | Message Type | Result | Code |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Transaction Identifier |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Port |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
-
- 7.1 Switch Configuration Message
-
- The Switch Configuration message requests the global (non port-
- specific) configuration for the switch. The Switch Configuration
- message is:
-
- Message Type = 64
-
- The Port field is not used in the request message.
-
- The Switch Configuration success response message has the following
- format:
-
- 0 1 2 3
- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Version | Message Type | Result | Code |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Transaction Identifier |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Firmware Version Number | Window Size |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Switch Type | |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ +
- | Switch Name |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
-
- Firmware Version Number
- The version number of the switch control firmware
- installed.
-
- Window Size
- The maximum number of unacknowledged request messages that
- may be transmitted by the controller without the
- possibility of loss. This field is used to prevent request
- messages being lost in the switch because of overflow in
- the receive buffer. The field is a hint to the controller.
- If desired, the controller may experiment with higher and
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 50]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- lower window sizes to determine heuristically the best
- window size.
-
- Switch Type
- A 16-bit field allocated by the manufacturer of the switch.
- (For these purposes the manufacturer of the switch is
- assumed to be the organization identified by the OUI in the
- Switch Name field.) The Switch Type identifies the product.
- When the Switch Type is combined with the OUI from the
- Switch Name the product is uniquely identified. Network
- Management may use this identification to obtain product
- related information from a database.
-
- Switch Name
- A 48-bit quantity that is unique within the operational
- context of the device. A 48-bit IEEE 802 MAC address, if
- available, may be used as the Switch Name. The most
- significant 24 bits of the Switch Name must be an
- Organizationally Unique Identifier (OUI) that identifies
- the manufacturer of the switch.
-
- 7.2 Port Configuration Message
-
- The Port Configuration message requests the switch for the
- configuration information of a single switch port. The Port field in
- the request message specifies the port for which the configuration is
- requested. The Port Configuration message is:
-
- Message Type = 65.
-
- The Port Configuration success response message has the following
- format:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 51]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- 0 1 2 3
- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Version | Message Type | Result | Code |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Transaction Identifier |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Port |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Port Session Number |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- |V|M|L|R| Min VPI |Q|x x x| Max VPI |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Min VCI | Max VCI |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Receive Cell Rate |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Transmit Cell Rate |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Port Status | Port Type | Line Status | Priorities |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Physical Slot Number | Physical Port Number |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
-
- Port
- The switch port to which the configuration information
- refers. Configuration information relating to both the
- input and the output sides of the switch port is given.
- Port numbers are 32 bits wide and allocated by the switch.
- The switch may choose to structure the 32 bits into
- subfields that have meaning to the physical structure of
- the switch hardware (e.g. physical slot and port). This
- structure may be indicated in the Physical Slot Number and
- Physical Port Number fields.
-
- Flags
-
- V: VP Switching
- The VP Switching flag, if set, indicates that this input
- port is capable of supporting virtual path switching. Else,
- if zero, it indicates that this input port is only capable
- of virtual channel switching.
-
- M: Multicast Labels
- The Multicast Labels flag, if set, indicates that this
- output port is capable of labelling each output branch of a
- point-to-multipoint tree with a different label. If zero,
- it indicates that this output port is not able to label
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 52]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- each output branch of a point-to-multipoint tree with a
- different label.
-
- L: Logical Multicast
- The Logical Multicast flag, if set, indicates that this
- output port is capable of supporting more than a single
- branch from any point-to-multipoint connection. This
- capability is often referred to as logical multicast. If
- zero, it indicates that this output port can only support a
- single output branch from each point-to-multipoint
- connection.
-
- R: Label Range
- The Label Range flag, if set, indicates that this switch
- port is capable of reallocating its VPI label range or its
- VCI label range and therefore accepts the Label Range
- message. Else, if zero, it indicates that this port does
- not accept Label Range messages.
-
- Q: QoS
- The QoS flag, if set, indicates that this switch port is
- capable of handling the Quality of Service messages defined
- in section 9 of this specification. Else, if zero, it
- indicates that this port does not accept the Quality of
- Service messages.
-
- x: Unused
-
- Min VPI
- The default minimum value of dynamically assigned incoming
- VPI that the connection table on the input port supports
- and that may be controlled by GSMP. This value is not
- changed as a result of the Label Range message.
-
- Max VPI
- The default maximum value of dynamically assigned incoming
- VPI that the connection table on the input port supports
- and that may be controlled by GSMP. This value is not
- changed as a result of the Label Range message.
-
- At power-on, after a hardware reset, and after the Reset
- Input Port function of the Port Management message, the
- input port must handle all values of VPI within the range
- Min VPI to Max VPI inclusive and GSMP must be able to
- control all values within this range. It should be noted
- that the range Min VPI to Max VPI refers only to the
- incoming VPI range that can be supported by the associated
- port. No restriction is placed on the values of outgoing
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 53]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- VPIs that may be written into the cell header. If the
- switch does not support virtual paths it is acceptable for
- both Min VPI and Max VPI to specify the same value, most
- likely zero.
-
- Use of the Label Range message allows the range of VPIs
- supported by the port to be changed. However, the Min VPI
- and Max VPI fields in the Port Configuration and All Ports
- Configuration messages always report the same default
- values regardless of the operation of the Label Range
- message.
-
- Min VCI
- The default minimum value of dynamically assigned incoming
- VCI that the connection table on the input port can support
- and may be controlled by GSMP. This value is not changed as
- a result of the Label Range message.
-
- Max VCI
- The default maximum value of dynamically assigned incoming
- VCI that the connection table on the input port can support
- and may be controlled by GSMP. This value is not changed as
- a result of the Label Range message.
-
- At power-on, after a hardware reset, and after the Reset
- Input Port function of the Port Management message, the
- input port must handle all values of VCI within the range
- Min VCI to Max VCI inclusive, for each of the virtual paths
- in the range Min VPI to Max VPI inclusive, and GSMP must be
- able to control all values within this range. It should be
- noted that the range Min VCI to Max VCI refers only to the
- incoming VCI range that can be supported by the associated
- port on each of the virtual paths in the range Min VPI to
- Max VPI. No restriction is placed on the values of outgoing
- VCIs that may be written into the cell header.
-
- Use of the Label Range message allows the range of VCIs to
- be changed on each VPI supported by the port. However, the
- Min VCI and Max VCI fields in the Port Configuration and
- All Ports Configuration messages always report the same
- default values regardless of the operation of the Label
- Range message.
-
- For a port over which the GSMP protocol is operating, the
- VCI of the GSMP control channel may or may not be reported
- as lying within the range Min VCI to Max VCI. A switch
- should honor a connection request message that specifies
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 54]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- the VCI value of the GSMP control channel even if it lies
- outside the range Min VCI to Max VCI.
-
- Receive Cell Rate
- The maximum rate of cells that may arrive at the input port
- in cells/s.
-
- Transmit Cell Rate
- The maximum rate of cells that may depart from the output
- port in cells/s. (The transmit cell rate of the output port
- may be changed by the Set Transmit Cell Rate function of
- the Port Management message.)
-
- Port Status
- Gives the administrative state of the port. The defined
- values of the Port Status field are:
-
- Available:
- Port Status = 1. The port is available to both send
- and receive cells. When a port changes to the
- Available state from any other administrative state,
- all dynamically assigned virtual connections must be
- cleared and a new Port Session Number must be
- generated.
-
- Unavailable:
- Port Status = 2. The port has intentionally been taken
- out of service. No cells will be transmitted from this
- port. No cells will be received by this port.
-
- Internal Loopback:
- Port Status = 3. The port has intentionally been taken
- out of service and is in internal loopback: cells
- arriving at the output port from the switch fabric are
- looped through to the input port to return to the
- switch fabric. All of the ATM functions of the input
- port above the physical layer, e.g. header
- translation, are performed upon the looped back cells.
-
- External Loopback:
- Port Status = 4. The port has intentionally been taken
- out of service and is in external loopback: cells
- arriving at the input port from the external
- communications link are immediately looped back to the
- communications link at the physical layer without
- entering the input port. None of the ATM functions of
- the input port above the physical layer are performed
- upon the looped back cells.
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 55]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- Bothway Loopback:
- Port Status = 5. The port has intentionally been taken
- out of service and is in both internal and external
- loopback.
-
- The Port Status of the port over which the GSMP session
- controlling the switch is running, must be declared
- Available. The controller will ignore any other Port status
- for this port. The Port Status of switch ports after
- power-on initialization is not defined by GSMP.
-
- Port Type
- The type of physical transmission interface for this port.
- The values for this field are defined by the atmIfType
- object specified in the Ipsilon IP Switch MIB [IpsilonMIB].
-
- Line Status
- The status of the physical transmission medium connected to
- the port. The defined values of the Line Status field are:
-
- Up:
- Line Status = 1. The line is able to both send and
- receive cells. When the Line Status changes to Up
- from either the Down or Test states, a new Port
- Session Number must be generated.
-
- Down:
- Line Status = 2. The line is unable either to send or
- receive cells or both.
-
- Test:
- Line Status = 3. The port or line is in a test mode,
- for example, power-on test.
-
- Priorities
- The number of different priority levels that this output
- port can assign to virtual connections. Zero is invalid in
- this field. If an output port is able to support "Q"
- priorities, the highest priority is numbered zero and the
- lowest priority is numbered "Q-1". The ability to offer
- different qualities of service to different connections
- based upon their priority is assumed to be a property of
- the output port of the switch. It may be assumed that for
- connections that share the same output port, an ATM cell on
- a connection with a higher priority is much more likely to
- exit the switch before an ATM cell on a connection with a
- lower priority if they are both in the switch at the same
- time.
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 56]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- Physical Slot Number
- The physical location of the slot in which the port is
- located. It is an unsigned 16-bit integer that can take any
- value except 0xFFFF. The value 0xFFFF is used to indicate
- "unknown." The Physical Slot Number is not used by the GSMP
- protocol. It is provided to assist network management in
- functions such as logging, port naming, and graphical
- representation.
-
- Physical Port Number
- The physical location of the port within the slot in which
- the port is located. It is an unsigned 16-bit integer that
- can take any value except 0xFFFF. The value 0xFFFF is used
- to indicate "unknown." The Physical Port Number is not used
- by the GSMP protocol. It is provided to assist network
- management in functions such as logging, port naming, and
- graphical representation.
-
- There must be a one to one mapping between Port Number and
- the Physical Slot Number and Physical Port Number
- combination. Two different Port Numbers must not yield the
- same Physical Slot Number and Physical Port Number
- combination. The same Port Number must yield the same
- Physical Slot Number and Physical Port Number within a
- single GSMP session. If both Physical Slot Number and
- Physical Port Number indicate "unknown" the physical
- location of switch ports may be discovered by looking up
- the product identity in a database to reveal the physical
- interpretation of the 32-bit Port Number.
-
- 7.3 All Ports Configuration Message
-
- The All Ports Configuration message requests the switch for the
- configuration information of all of its ports. The All Ports
- Configuration message is:
-
- Message Type = 66
-
- The Port field is not used in the request message.
-
- The All Ports Configuration success response message has the
- following format:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 57]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- 0 1 2 3
- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Version | Message Type | Result | Code |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Transaction Identifier |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Number of Records | Port Record Length |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | |
- ~ Port Records ~
- | |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
-
- Number of Records
- Field gives the total number of Port Records to be returned
- in response to the All Ports Configuration request message.
- The number of port records in a single All Ports
- Configuration success response must not cause the packet
- length to exceed the maximum transmission unit defined by
- the encapsulation. If a switch has more ports than can be
- sent in a single success response message it must send
- multiple success response messages. All success response
- messages that are sent in response to the same request
- message must have the same Transaction Identifier as the
- request message and the same value in the Number of Records
- field. All success response messages that are sent in
- response to the same request message, except for the last
- message, must have the result field set to "More." The last
- message, or a single success response message, must have
- the result field set to "Success." All Port records within
- a success response message must be complete, i.e. a single
- Port record must not be split across multiple success
- response messages.
-
- Port Record Length
- Field gives the length of each port record in bytes. This
- is currently 32 but the Port Record Length field allows for
- the future definition of further fields at the end of the
- port record while preserving compatibility with earlier
- versions of the protocol.
-
- Port Records
- Follow in the remainder of the message. Each port record
- has the following format:
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 58]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- 0 1 2 3
- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Port |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Port Session Number |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- |V|M|L|R| Min VPI |Q|x x x| Max VPI |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Min VCI | Max VCI |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Receive Cell Rate |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Transmit Cell Rate |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Port Status | Port Type | Line Status | Priorities |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Physical Slot Number | Physical Port Number |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
-
- The definition of the fields in the Port Record is exactly the same
- as that of the Port Configuration message.
-
-
- 8. Event Messages
-
- Event messages allow the switch to inform the controller of certain
- asynchronous events. Event messages are not acknowledged. The Result
- field and the Code field in the message header are not used and
- should be set to zero. Event messages are not sent during
- initialization. Event messages have the following format:
-
- 0 1 2 3
- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Version | Message Type | Result | Code |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Transaction Identifier |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Port |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Port Session Number |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Event Sequence Number |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | zero | VPI | VCI |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 59]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- Event Sequence Number
- The current value of the Event Sequence Number for the
- specified port. The Event Sequence Number is set to zero
- when the port is initialized. It is incremented by one each
- time the port detects an asynchronous event that the switch
- would normally report via an Event message. The Event
- Sequence Number must be incremented each time an event
- occurs even if the switch is prevented from sending an
- Event message due to the action of the flow control.
-
- VPI/VCI
- Field gives the VPI/VCI to which the event message refers.
- If this field is not required by the event message it is
- set to zero.
-
- Each switch port must maintain an Event Sequence Number and a set of
- Event Flags, one Event Flag for each type of Event message. When a
- switch port sends an Event message it must set the Event Flag on that
- port corresponding to the type of the event. The port is not
- permitted to send another Event message of the same type until the
- Event Flag has been reset. Event Flags are reset by the "Reset Event
- Flags" function of the Port Management message. This is a simple flow
- control preventing the switch from flooding the controller with event
- messages. The Event Sequence Number of the port must be incremented
- every time an event is detected on that port even if the port is
- prevented from reporting the event due to the action of the flow
- control. This allows the controller to detect that it has not been
- informed of some events that have occurred on the port due to the
- action of the flow control.
-
- 8.1 Port Up Message
-
- The Port Up message informs the controller that the Line Status of a
- port has changed from either the Down or Test state to the Up state.
- When the Line Status of a switch port changes to the Up state from
- either the Down or Test state a new Port Session Number must be
- generated, preferably using some form of random number. The new Port
- Session Number is given in the Port Session Number field. The VPI/VCI
- field is not used and is set to zero. The Port Up message is:
-
- Message Type = 80
-
- 8.2 Port Down Message
-
- The Port Down message informs the controller that the Line Status of
- a port has changed from the Up state to the Down state. This message
- will be sent to report link failure if the switch is capable of
- detecting link failure. The port session number that was valid before
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 60]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- the port went down is reported in the Port Session Number field. The
- VPI/VCI field is not used and is set to zero. The Port Down message
- is:
-
- Message Type = 81
-
- 8.3 Invalid VPI/VCI Message
-
- The Invalid VPI/VCI message is sent to inform the controller that one
- or more cells have arrived at an input port with a VPI/VCI that is
- currently not allocated to an assigned connection. The input port is
- indicated in the Port field, and the VPI/VCI in the VPI/VCI field.
- The Invalid VPI/VCI message is:
-
- Message Type = 82
-
- 8.4 New Port Message
-
- The New Port message informs the controller that a new port has been
- added to the switch. The port number of the new port is given in the
- Port field. A new Port Session Number must be assigned, preferably
- using some form of random number. The new Port Session Number is
- given in the Port Session Number field. The state of the new port is
- undefined so the VPI/VCI field is not used and is set to zero. The
- New Port message is:
-
- Message Type = 83
-
- 8.5 Dead Port Message
-
- The Dead Port message informs the controller that a port has been
- removed from the switch. The port number of the port is given in the
- Port field. The Port Session Number that was valid before the port
- was removed is reported in the Port Session Number field. The
- VPI/VCI fields are not used and are set to zero. The Dead Port
- message is:
-
- Message Type = 84
-
-
- 9. Quality of Service Messages
-
- The GSMP Quality of Service (QoS) messages allow a controller to
- group virtual path connections and virtual channel connections into
- QoS classes, and to allocate QoS resources to both QoS classes and to
- individual connections. At initialization, the switch describes its
- QoS capabilities to the controller, in terms of the abstract switch
- model, using the QoS Configuration message. The controller issues
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 61]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- Scheduler Establishment messages to configure the scheduler on each
- switch output port. It also issues QoS Class Establishment messages
- to configure QoS classes. Connections may be added to, or deleted
- from, a QoS class using the QoS Connection Management message. QoS
- resources may also be assigned to individual connections using the
- QoS Connection Management message. Connections that only require the
- scheduler may use the simple connection management messages defined
- in Section 3, "Connection Management Messages."
-
- 9.1 Abstract Switch Model
-
- The abstract switch model, fig. 1, is the means by which a switch can
- describe its fundamental QoS capabilities to a controller. It
- consists of four main functions: a policer, a classifier, a
- regulator, and a scheduler. The classifier groups multiple
- connections (VPCs or VCCs) together into a QoS class such that QoS
- resources may be shared by the QoS class as a whole. Within a QoS
- class there is no differentiation between members of the class in
- terms of QoS resources received. However, the ordering of cells
- within each constituent VPC or VCC must be preserved on exit from the
- switch. Connections are not required to be aggregated into a QoS
- class with other connections; they may be allocated individual QoS
- resources.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 62]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- VPC/VCCs Policer Classifier Regulator Scheduler
-
- +--+ +----+ +--------+
- -------->| |---->| | | |
- +--+ | | | |
- | | | |
- +--+ | | +----+ | |
- -------->| |---->| | | |--------->| |
- +--+ | | | |conforming| |
- | |------>| | | |
- +--+ | | QoS | | | |
- -------->| |---->| | Class | |--------->| |
- +--+ | | +----+ excess | |
- | | | |
- +--+ | | | |
- -------->| |---->| | | |
- +--+ +----+ | |
- | |
- | | Output
- | | Port
- | |---------->
- | |
- | |
- +--+ +----+ | |
- -------->| |---->| | | |
- +--+ | | | |
- | | | |
- +--+ | | +----+ | |
- -------->| |---->| | | |--------->| |
- +--+ | | | |conforming| |
- | |------>| | | |
- +--+ | | QoS | | | |
- -------->| |---->| | Class | |--------->| |
- +--+ | | +----+ excess | |
- | | | |
- +--+ | | | |
- -------->| |---->| | | |
- +--+ +----+ | |
- +--------+
-
- Fig. 1: Abstract Switch Model
-
- The policer is a single input, single output device that can discard
- or tag cells. A policer may be applied to police each individual
- connection. A policer may also be applied to police the aggregate
- traffic of a QoS class. The policer is used to enforce an upper
- bound on the traffic on a connection or on a QoS class.
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 63]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- The regulator follows the policer and classifier. It offers either a
- policing function or a shaping function. The policing function
- evaluates cells as conforming to the rate specified by the regulator
- parameters or as being in excess of that rate. One of three actions
- can be specified to be taken for each cell as a result of this
- evaluation: tagging, discard or differentiated scheduling. Tagging
- sets the CLP bit of cells deemed to be in excess of the rate defined
- by the regulator parameters. The discard function discards excess
- cells. The differentiated scheduling function allows conforming cells
- and excess cells to be scheduled for service at different points in
- the scheduler. This would allow conforming cells, for example, to
- receive service with a QoS guarantee, whereas excess cells receive
- best-effort service. The implementation of differentiated
- scheduling, however, is complicated by the requirement not to reorder
- cells within each connection.
-
- The shaping function of the regulator paces cells out, on each QoS
- class or individual connection, at the rate specified by the
- regulator parameters. No jitter requirement may be specified, nor is
- any specific guarantee of jitter given. If traffic arrives on any QoS
- class or individual connection at a greater rate than the output rate
- specified, that traffic will be delayed. If the delayed traffic for
- any QoS class or individual connection exceeds a bound, discard will
- occur. Differentiated scheduling is supported by the shaper but its
- application to shaping is somewhat different than its application to
- policing. Conforming traffic is that traffic which leaves the shaper
- as a result of the shaping process. The conforming pointer specifies
- the point in the scheduler structure where such traffic is scheduled
- for output. (This is typically the highest priority of the scheduler
- but the GSMP specification permits other priorities to be specified.)
- If an excess pointer is also enabled for a particular QoS class or
- individual connection, traffic in excess of the rate specified by the
- shaper may also be transmitted. The position of the excess pointer
- in the scheduler structure determines the undefined amount of
- additional traffic that will be supported. The excess traffic may be
- tagged if required, if tagging is supported. The excess pointer will
- receive the same share of bandwidth that a best-effort class or
- connection would receive at the same location in the scheduler
- structure.
-
- The location of the classifier and regulator functions in the switch
- is important. If the classifier is located on an input port, only
- virtual connections that arrive at that input port may be aggregated
- into a QoS class. If the classifier is centralized, or located on an
- output port, virtual connections that arrive at any input port may be
- aggregated into the same QoS class. If the regulator is located on an
- output port all virtual connections within a QoS class passing
- through that regulator must exit the switch at that output port.
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 64]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- However, if the regulator is centralized, or located on an input
- port, virtual connections that are part of the same QoS class may be
- switched to different output ports. Each switch port must specify
- the location of its classifier and regulator functions.
-
- The scheduler is located on the output port, fig. 2. It distributes
- the bandwidth of the output link between the QoS classes and
- individual connections. It is a two-level scheduler: a priority
- scheduler at one level and a FIFO or a weighted scheduler at the
- other. Up to 255 strict priority levels may be supported. Traffic in
- any specific priority level may only be transmitted if no traffic is
- queued for transmission in any higher priority level. Within each
- priority level a weighted scheduler may be defined. Each leaf of the
- scheduler tree is connected to a waiting room. The waiting room has
- two functions. When it receives service from the scheduler, it must
- select a QoS class or individual connection for transmission. When it
- is notified of traffic arrival on a QoS class or connection, it must
- decide whether there is enough room left in the waiting room to
- accept the traffic, else that traffic must be discarded. The waiting
- room has a size parameter indicating how much traffic may be
- accepted. Other queueing parameters may be attached to the waiting
- room. Multiple conforming and excess pointers from the regulators may
- point to each waiting room. Within a waiting room, the scheduling of
- multiple connections sharing that waiting room may support weighted
- sharing between the connections.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 65]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- From Waiting FIFO/Weighted Priority
- Regulator Room Scheduler Scheduler
-
- Net +---+
- +------+ Weight | |
- ---------->| |-%-------->| 0 |------\
- +------+ | | \
- +---+ \
- ---------->+------+ |
- | |-%--\ +---+ |
- ---------->+------+ \---->| | |
- | 1 |---\ |
- +------+ /---->| | \ \
- ---------->| |-%--/ +---+ \ \ +---+
- +------+ \ \-->| |
- \----->| |--------->
- ---------->+------+ /-->| | Output
- ---------->| |-%-\ / +---+ Port
- ---------->+------+ \ /
- \ +---+ /
- +------+ \--->| | /
- ---------->| |-%-------->| 2 |-----/
- +------+ /--->| |
- / +---+
- +------+ /
- ---------->| |-%-/
- +------+
-
- Fig. 2: The Scheduler
-
- 9.2 QoS Configuration Message
-
- The QoS Configuration message permits the controller to discover the
- QoS capabilities of each switch port in terms of the abstract switch
- model. The QoS Configuration message is:
-
- Message Type = 96
-
-
- The QoS Configuration request message has the following format:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 66]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- 0 1 2 3
- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Version | Message Type | Result | Code |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Transaction Identifier |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Port |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
-
- The QoS Configuration success response message has the following
- format:
-
- 0 1 2 3
- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Version | Message Type | Result | Code |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Transaction Identifier |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Port |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Port Session Number |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Scheduler Flags | Regulator Flags |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Excess Capabilities | Reserved |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Hi Sharing | Lo Sharing | Max Classes |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Default Size |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Default Discard Threshold |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Max Buffer |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Max Shaper Buffer |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Scaling Factor |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
-
- Port
- The switch port to which the QoS configuration information
- refers. QoS configuration information relating to both the
- input and the output sides of the switch port is given.
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 67]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- Scheduler Flags
-
- 0 1
- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- |W|Q|S|G|D|F|M|B|I|x x x x x x x|
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
-
- W: Weighted Connections
- Bit 0 of the Scheduler Flags field, if set, indicates that
- a weighted service algorithm (such as weighted round-robin)
- is available for allocation of service to individual
- connections within at least some waiting rooms. It means
- that a Connection Weight parameter can be attached to a QoS
- Connection Management message. Not all waiting rooms at all
- priority levels may be able to support this function.
- Whether a particular waiting room can support this function
- will be discovered when a QoS Connection Management message
- is issued.
-
- Q: Weighted QoS Classes
- Bit 1 of the Scheduler Flags field, if set, indicates that
- a weighted service algorithm (such as weighted round-robin)
- is available for allocation of service to QoS classes
- within at least some waiting rooms. It means that a QoS
- Class Weight parameter can be attached to a QoS Class
- Establishment message. Not all waiting rooms at all
- priority levels may be able to support this function.
- Whether a particular waiting room can support this function
- will be discovered when a QoS Class Establishment message
- is issued.
-
- S: Shared Waiting Room
- Bit 2 of the Scheduler Flags field, if set, indicates that
- multiple QoS classes and multiple connections may be
- scheduled within a single waiting room. This is expected to
- be the normal case. If Bit 2 of the Scheduler Flags field
- is zero, it indicates that only a single QoS class or a
- single connection may be directed to any single waiting
- room.
-
- G: Global Max Classes
- Bit 3 of the Scheduler Flags field, if set, indicates that
- the Max Classes field gives the maximum number of QoS
- classes that may be supported by the entire switch. If
- zero, it indicates that the Max Classes field gives the
- maximum number of QoS classes that may be supported by this
- switch port.
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 68]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- D: Packet Discard
- Bit 4 of the Scheduler Flags field, if set, indicates that
- the scheduler on this output port is capable of packet
- discard. Packet discard indicates a discard algorithm that
- is aware of AAL-5 packet boundaries and attempts to discard
- whole packets. No specific algorithm is indicated though
- Early Packet Discard (EPD) is likely to be the most common.
- Other algorithms such as "push from front" schemes, dynamic
- threshold, or Random Early Detection (RED) are also
- examples of possible packet discard algorithms. The only
- parameters available to the packet discard algorithm, via
- GSMP, are the Size and Discard Threshold of the waiting
- room.
-
- F: Frame-Based Scheduling
- Bit 5 of the Scheduler Flags field, if set, indicates that
- the scheduler on this output port is capable of frame-based
- scheduling. In frame-based scheduling, a connection is only
- scheduled for transmission when a complete AAL-5 packet is
- available. When a connection is scheduled for
- transmission, all cells belonging to one or more complete
- packets from that connection will be transmitted without
- being interleaved with any other cells on that output port
- (regardless of their priority). Frame-based scheduling is
- a property of the waiting room and is requested in the
- Scheduler Establishment message. A QoS class may be routed
- through a waiting room configured with frame-based
- scheduling. In this case each component connection of the
- QoS class will receive frame based scheduling. For correct
- distribution of bandwidth, each QoS class that requires
- frame-based scheduling should have its own waiting room.
-
- M: VC Merging
- Bit 6 of the Scheduler Flags field, if set, indicates that
- the scheduler on this output port is capable of VC merging
- by a mechanism other than frame-based scheduling. VC
- merging indicates that the switch is capable of the
- multipoint-to-point merging of two or more incoming virtual
- connections onto a single outgoing virtual connection
- without interleaving cells from different AAL-5 packets
- that bear the same VPI/VCI. VC merging differs from frame-
- based scheduling in that cells with a different VPI/VCI may
- be interleaved with those of a multipoint-to-point VC
- merging connection. Thus, higher priority cells may be
- interleaved during the transmission of a packet on a lower
- priority VC merging connection. Most switches achieve VC
- merging by using frame-based scheduling. VC merging is a
- property of the waiting room and is requested in the
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 69]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- Scheduler Establishment message. A QoS class may be routed
- through a waiting room configured with VC merging. In this
- case each component connection of the QoS class will
- receive VC merging.
-
- B: Shared Buffer
- Bit 7 of the Scheduler Flags field, if set, indicates that
- at least some of the buffer space specified by the Max
- Buffer field is shared with other ports. If zero, it
- indicates that the buffer space specified by the Max Buffer
- field is not shared with other ports.
-
- I: Identical Ports
- Bit 8 of the Scheduler Flags field, if set, indicates that
- all ports of the switch have identical QoS capabilities. If
- this bit is set the controller does not have to request the
- QoS configuration of each port individually as all ports
- have the same capability.
-
- x: Bits 9--15 of the Scheduler Flags field are not used.
-
- Regulator Flags
-
- 0 1
- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- |C|Q|I O|P|S|H|M|x x x x x x x x|
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
-
- C: Connection Policing
- Bit 0 of the Regulator Flags field indicates that this
- input port supports the policing of individual incoming
- connections. The parameters for the policer are specified
- in the QoS Connection Management message when the
- connection is established.
-
- Q: QoS Class Policing
- If bit 1 of the Regulator Flags field is set, a policer
- function is available to police each QoS class on output
- from the classifier. The parameters for this policer are
- specified in the QoS Class Establishment message. If this
- bit is zero, no policer function is available to police a
- QoS class.
-
- IO: QoS Class Location
- Bits 2 and 3 of the Regulator Flags field specify the
- location of the classifier and regulator functions. If both
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 70]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- bits 2 and 3 of the Regulator Flags field are zero, no
- classifier or regulator function is available to this port.
-
- If bit 2 of the Regulator Flags field is set and bit 3 is
- zero, the classifier and regulator functions are available
- on the input port. This implies that only virtual
- connections arriving at this input port may be grouped into
- QoS classes by this classifier. However, connections in a
- QoS class output from this regulator may be switched to any
- output port.
-
- If bit 2 of the Regulator Flags field is zero and bit 3 is
- set, the classifier and regulator functions are available
- on the output port. This implies that virtual connections
- arriving at any input port may be grouped into QoS classes
- by this classifier. However, all connections in any QoS
- class output from this regulator may only be switched to
- this output port.
-
- If both bits 2 and 3 of the Regulator Flags field are set,
- this switch port has access to centralized classifier and
- regulator functions. This implies that virtual connections
- arriving at any input port may be grouped into a QoS class
- by this classifier. Also, connections in a QoS class output
- from this regulator may be switched to any output port.
-
- Regulator Function
-
- P: If bit 4 of the Regulator Flags field is set, the regulator
- is able to support the policing function.
-
- S: If bit 5 of the Regulator Flags field is set, the regulator
- is able to support the shaping function on all priority
- levels of the scheduler.
-
- H: If bit 5 of the Regulator Flags field is zero and bit 6 is
- set, the regulator is able to support the shaping function
- but only on the highest priority level of the scheduler.
- All connections and QoS classes using this regulator must
- be routed to a waiting room at the highest priority level
- of the scheduler.
-
- M: QoS Multicast
- If bit 7 of the Regulator Flags field is set, any point-
- to-multipoint connection arriving on this input port, with
- QoS parameters established by the GSMP Quality of Service
- messages, must use the same QoS parameters for all output
- branches.
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 71]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- x: Bits 8--15 of the Regulator Flags field are not used.
-
- Excess Capabilities
-
- 0 1
- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- |D|T|S|A|B|x x x x x x x x x x x|
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
-
- Policer:
-
- D: If bit 0 of the Excess Capabilities field is set, the policer
- function of the regulator is able to support discard.
-
- T: If bit 1 of the Excess Capabilities field is set, the policer
- function of the regulator is able to support tagging.
-
- S: If bit 2 of the Excess Capabilities field is set, the policer
- function of the regulator is able to support differentiated
- scheduling.
-
- Shaper:
-
- A: If bit 3 of the Excess Capabilities field is set, the shaper
- function of the regulator is able to support tagging.
-
- B: If bit 4 of the Excess Capabilities field is set, the shaper
- function of the regulator is able to support differentiated
- scheduling.
-
- x: Bits 5--15 of the Excess Capabilities field are not used.
-
- Hi Sharing
- Lo Sharing
- Defines a range of priority levels that support weighted
- sharing. Each priority level in the range Lo Sharing to Hi
- Sharing inclusive, supports weighted sharing. A priority
- level that supports weighted sharing offers a weighted
- sharing algorithm (for example, weighted round-robin)
- between waiting rooms within that priority level. This
- permits the output link bandwidth available at that
- priority level, to be shared between the waiting rooms
- allocated to that priority level, according to the Net
- Weight parameter of each waiting room. The value 0xFF for
- both parameters indicates that this output port does not
- support weighted sharing in any priority level.
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 72]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- Max Classes
- If bit 3 of the Scheduler Flags field is zero, Max Classes
- gives the maximum number of QoS classes that may be
- supported by this switch port. In this case the maximum
- number of QoS classes that may be supported by this switch
- port is not affected by the number of QoS classes in use by
- other switch ports. If bit 3 of the Scheduler Flags field
- is set, Max Classes gives the maximum number of QoS classes
- that may be supported by the entire switch. In this case it
- is assumed that use of these QoS classes may be distributed
- among the various switch ports.
-
- Default Size
- The size of waiting room that this output port allocates by
- default. The actual size of waiting room may be specified
- in the Scheduler Establishment message. The size of a
- waiting room specifies the maximum number of cells
- permitted to wait for transmission via that waiting room.
- Any further cells arriving at that waiting room beyond this
- number will be discarded.
-
- Default Discard Threshold
- The value of discard threshold that this output port
- allocates by default. The actual value of discard threshold
- may be specified in the Scheduler Establishment message.
- The discard threshold specifies the number of cells waiting
- for transmission via a waiting room after which further
- arriving cells will be subject to a discard mechanism.
-
- Max Buffer
- The maximum amount of buffer space, measured in cells,
- available to this port. If bit 7 of the Scheduler Flags
- field is zero this, buffer space is not shared with other
- ports. If bit 7 of the Scheduler Flags field is set, at
- least some of this buffer space is shared with other ports.
-
- Max Shaper Buffer
- The maximum amount of buffer space, measured in cells,
- available to a QoS connection or a QoS class within the
- shaper function of the regulator. This shaper buffer space
- is likely to be shared among all QoS classes and QoS
- connections using the shaper, so there is no guarantee that
- the amount of buffer space defined by the Max Shaper Buffer
- field will be available to any particular QoS class or QoS
- connection.
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 73]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- Scaling Factor
- The QoS Class Establishment and QoS Connection Management
- messages require parameters that describe cell rates in
- cells per second or their reciprocal, cell interarrival
- periods, in seconds per cell. In order that these
- parameters may be specified with a 32-bit unsigned integer,
- the switch defines a Scaling Factor to be used in defining
- such parameters. By appropriate choice of the Scaling
- Factor the switch can select the range and granularity of
- rate or time that can be specified with the 32-bit unsigned
- integer. Further details are given in the discussion of
- the UPC Parameters field of the QoS Connection Management
- message.
-
- 9.3 Scheduler Establishment Message
-
- The Scheduler Establishment message is used to configure the
- scheduler on a specified output port. It is used to configure a
- waiting room, attach it to a leaf of the scheduler tree, and return a
- Scheduler Identifier to reference the waiting room. The Scheduler
- Establishment message may also be used to modify the parameters of an
- already established waiting room.
-
- Scheduler Identifiers in the range 0--255 represent default values.
- They are used for the priority levels that may be specified in the
- Class of Service field of Connection Management messages without
- requiring explicit establishment via a Scheduler Establishment
- message. Each of these default values specifies a single waiting
- room with default parameters, configured as a FIFO queue, on each of
- the valid scheduler priority levels. (This permits Connection
- Management messages to continue to specify QoS requirements as a
- priority without requiring the use of any of the QoS messages.) The
- number of priority levels available to the scheduler is specified in
- the Priorities field of the Port Configuration and All Ports
- Configuration messages.
-
- The Scheduler Establishment Message is:
-
- Message Type = 97
-
- The Scheduler Establishment request and success response messages
- have the following format:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 74]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- 0 1 2 3
- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Version | Message Type | Result | Code |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Transaction Identifier |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Port |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Port Session Number |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Scheduler Identifier | Net Weight |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Reserved |D|F|M|W|x x x x| Priority |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Waiting Room Size |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Discard Threshold |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
-
- Scheduler Identifier
- The Scheduler Identifier is selected by the controller. It
- is used to identify the waiting room being established or
- modified in future messages. The Scheduler Identifier is
- taken from a namespace that is local to the switch port. A
- Scheduler Identifier in the Scheduler Establishment message
- must be greater than 0x00FF but less than 0xFFFF. The
- values 0 -- 0x00FF are reserved for use as default values.
- The default values of the Scheduler Identifier are used to
- specify the default settings for the scheduler. Each of the
- default values maps directly to one of the scheduler
- priority levels. The value 0xFFFF is reserved for use in
- the QoS Connection Management message.
-
- Net Weight
- The Net Weight specifies the share of the bandwidth
- available to the priority level, specified by the Priority
- field, that should be given to this waiting room. The Net
- Weight parameter is only valid if the priority level
- specified by the Priority field supports weighted sharing.
-
- The Net Weight is an unsigned 16-bit field specifying a
- binary fraction. I.e. the bandwidth share, as a fraction
- of the bandwidth available to the priority level, is given
- by:
-
- Bandwidth share = Net Weight * 2**(-16)
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 75]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- A Net Weight of zero indicates equal sharing between all
- waiting rooms sharing this priority level that request a
- Net Weight of zero. While a 16-bit field is used to
- specify the Net Weight it is understood that the accuracy
- of the bandwidth sharing is hardware dependent and is not
- specified.
-
- If weighted sharing is not required at a particular
- priority level, a waiting room with a Net Weight value of
- 0xFFFF must be specified for that priority level. A
- priority level that does not support weighted sharing can
- only support a single waiting room.
-
- Flags
-
- D: Packet Discard
- Bit 0 of the Flags field, if set, indicates that packet
- discard is required on all connections and QoS classes
- routed through this waiting room.
-
- F: Frame-Based Scheduling
- Bit 1 of the Flags field, if set, indicates that frame-
- based scheduling is required on all connections and QoS
- classes routed through this waiting room. In frame-based
- scheduling, a connection is only scheduled for transmission
- when a complete AAL-5 packet is available. When a
- connection is scheduled for transmission, all cells
- belonging to one or more complete packets from that
- connection will be transmitted without being interleaved
- with any other cells on that output port. A QoS class may
- be routed through a waiting room configured with frame-
- based scheduling. In this case each component connection
- of the QoS class will receive frame based scheduling. For
- correct distribution of bandwidth, each QoS class that
- requires frame-based scheduling should have its own waiting
- room.
-
- M: VC Merging
- Bit 2 of the Scheduler Flags field, if set, indicates that
- VC merging is required on all connections and QoS classes
- routed through this waiting room. VC merging enables the
- multipoint-to-point merging of two or more incoming virtual
- connections onto a single outgoing virtual connection,
- without interleaving cells from different AAL-5 packets
- that bear the same VPI/VCI. VC merging differs from frame-
- based scheduling in that cells with a different VPI/VCI may
- be interleaved with those of a multipoint-to-point VC
- merging connection. Most switches achieve VC merging by
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 76]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- using frame-based scheduling. A QoS class may be routed
- through a waiting room configured with VC merging. In this
- case each component connection of the QoS class will
- receive VC merging.
-
- W: Weighted Scheduling
- Bit 3 of the Flags field, if set, indicates that weighted
- scheduling is required on all connections and QoS classes
- routed through this waiting room. All connections and QoS
- classes routed through this waiting room will require a
- Connection Weight or a QoS Class Weight respectively. The
- Connection Weight is specified in the QoS Connection
- Management message. The QoS Class Weight is specified in
- the QoS Class Establishment message. If weighted scheduling
- within this waiting room is unavailable, a failure response
- message must be returned indicating, "Weighted scheduling
- within this waiting room is unavailable."
-
- Bit 3 of the Flags field, if zero, indicates that this
- waiting room should be configured as a single FIFO queue.
- All cells arriving at this waiting room will receive
- first-in-first-out service. If Frame-Based Scheduling or VC
- Merging are also selected, the strict first-in-first-out
- service discipline will be modified by the requirement to
- support Frame-Based Scheduling or VC Merging.
-
- x: Bits 4--7 of the Flags field are not used.
-
- Priority
- Specifies the priority level in the scheduler to which the
- waiting room should be attached. Priorities are numbered
- from zero, with priority level zero being the highest
- priority.
-
- Waiting Room Size
- The required size of the waiting room. The size of a
- waiting room specifies the maximum number of cells
- permitted to wait for transmission via that waiting room.
- Any further cells arriving at that waiting room beyond this
- number will be discarded. If the switch is unable to grant
- the size requested in the Scheduler Establishment request
- message it may reply with the actual size allocated to the
- waiting room in the Waiting Room Size field of the success
- response message. A value of zero for the Waiting Room
- Size indicates that the default value should be used.
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 77]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- Discard Threshold
- The required value of the discard threshold. The discard
- threshold specifies the number of cells waiting for
- transmission via a waiting room after which further
- arriving cells will be subject to a discard mechanism. The
- value of the Discard Threshold must be less than or equal
- to the value of the Waiting Room Size parameter for any
- given waiting room. If the switch is unable to grant the
- value of discard threshold requested in the Scheduler
- Establishment request message it may reply with the actual
- value of discard threshold allocated to the waiting room in
- the Discard Threshold field of the success response
- message. A value of zero for the Discard Threshold
- indicates that the default value should be used.
-
-
- 9.4 QoS Class Establishment Message
-
- The QoS Class Establishment message is used to configure a QoS class
- on a specified port or to modify the parameters of an already
- established QoS class. It configures the classifier and the
- regulator functions for the QoS class. It also configures the QoS
- class policer if a policing function is available for QoS classes.
-
- Two styles of QoS class are available. In one style each component
- connection of the QoS class may be routed independently to an output
- port and waiting room specified in its connection management message.
- In this case the Scheduler Identifier, and if required, the Excess
- Scheduler Id, are specified in the QoS Connection Management message
- that references this style of QoS class. In the alternative style of
- QoS class, all component connections in the QoS class are routed to
- the same waiting room on the same output port. In this case the
- Output Port, the Scheduler Identifier, and if required, the Excess
- Scheduler Id, are specified in the QoS Class Establishment message.
-
- The classifier and regulator functions must be located together,
- either on an input port, on an output port, or centralized. Each port
- declares the location of its classifier and regulator functions at
- initialization using the QoS Configuration message. If the classifier
- and regulator functions are located on an input port, only
- connections that arrive at that input port may join a QoS class
- established on that port. However, each connection that is part of a
- QoS class established on that port may be switched to a different
- output port. If the classifier and regulator functions are located on
- an output port, connections that arrive at any input port may join a
- QoS class established on that port. However, all connections within a
- QoS class established on that port must be switched to that output
- port. For a centralized classifier and regulator function, there is
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 78]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- no restriction on the input ports on which connections in a QoS class
- must arrive, or on the output ports to which connections in a QoS
- class must be switched. (For the case of a centralized classifier
- and regulator the actual port specified in the QoS Class
- Establishment message is used only for administrative purposes. Any
- valid value of Port and Port Session Number, that specifies a
- centralized classifier and regulator function, may be used.)
-
- The QoS Class Establishment message is:
-
- Message Type = 98
-
- The QoS Class Establishment request and success response messages
- have the following format:
-
- 0 1 2 3
- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Version | Message Type | Result | Code |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Transaction Identifier |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Port |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Port Session Number |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | QoS Class Identifier |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Regulator | Excess Action | QoS Class Weight |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Scheduler Identifier | Excess Scheduler Id |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Output Port |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | |
- ~ QoS Class Policer Parameters ~
- | |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | |
- ~ QoS Class Regulator Parameters ~
- | |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
-
- QoS Class Identifier
- The QoS Class Identifier is selected by the controller. It
- is used to identify the QoS class being established or
- modified, in future QoS Connection Management and QoS Class
- Establishment messages. It is taken from a namespace that
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 79]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- is global across the entire switch. No two QoS classes may
- have the same QoS Class Identifier regardless of the switch
- ports on which they are defined. A QoS Class Identifier in
- a QoS Class Establishment message must be greater than 0
- and less than 0xFFFFFFFF.
-
- Regulator
- The Regulator field specifies which function is required of
- the regulator. Three possible functions are currently
- defined: none, policing, and shaping.
-
- None: Regulator = 1
- Policing: Regulator = 2
- Shaping: Regulator = 3
-
- If the Regulator function is specified as none, no
- operations are performed by the regulator on the cells
- output from the classifier. Cells output from the
- classifier are transferred directly to the waiting room
- specified by the Scheduler Identifier.
-
- If policing is specified, a token bucket policer will be
- applied to the QoS class. The policer determines which
- cells conform to the specified policer traffic parameters
- and which do not. Conforming cells are transferred directly
- to the waiting room specified by the Scheduler Identifier.
- The action to be taken by the policer on the excess traffic
- is specified by the Excess Action field. The policer
- traffic parameters are specified in the QoS Class Regulator
- Parameters fields.
-
- If shaping is specified, traffic shaping will be applied to
- the QoS class. Cells in a QoS class should leave the
- regulator spaced evenly apart at a rate defined by the QoS
- Class Regulator Parameters fields. These cells are
- transferred directly to the waiting room specified by the
- Scheduler Identifier. The jitter on the conforming cell
- stream on exit from the shaping function of the regulator
- is not specified.
-
- Excess Action
-
- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- |T|D|S|x x x x x|
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 80]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- T: Tagging
- If bit 0 of the Excess Action field is set, all cells
- transferred to the waiting room specified by the Excess
- Scheduler Id will have their CLP bit set. If bit 0 of the
- Excess Action field is zero, the CLP bit of cells
- transferred to the waiting room specified by the Excess
- Scheduler Id will remain unchanged.
-
- D: Discard
- This function is only available if policing is selected as
- the regulator function. If the Regulator field specifies
- Policing, and bit 1 of the Excess Action field is set, all
- cells determined by the policer to be in excess of the
- traffic parameters must be discarded. In this case the
- Excess Scheduler Id is not used and bit 0 of the Excess
- Action field should be ignored.
-
- S: Differentiated Scheduling
- This function operates differently according to whether
- policing or shaping is selected as the regulator function.
-
- If the Regulator field specifies Policing, and bit 1 of the
- Excess Action field is zero, and bit 2 of the Excess Action
- field is set, all cells determined by the policer to be in
- excess of the traffic parameters must be transferred to the
- waiting room specified by the Excess Scheduler Id. In this
- case care must be taken in the implementation to ensure
- that within each virtual path connection or virtual channel
- connection, cells depart in the same order that they
- arrived. If the Regulator field specifies Policing, and
- bit 1 of the Excess Action field is zero, and bit 2 of the
- Excess Action field is zero, all cells determined by the
- policer to be in excess of the traffic parameters must be
- transferred to the waiting room specified by the Scheduler
- Identifier. In this case the Excess Scheduler Id is not
- used.
-
- If the Regulator field specifies Shaping, and bit 2 of the
- Excess Action field is zero, cells will be transferred from
- the QoS class to the waiting room pointed to by the
- Scheduler Identifier at a rate defined by the QoS Class
- Regulator Parameters. In this case the Excess Scheduler Id
- is not used. If the Regulator field specifies Shaping, and
- bit 2 of the Excess Action field is set, additional cells
- will be scheduled for transmission by the waiting room
- pointed to by the Excess Scheduler Id. This permits a
- minimum cell rate to be allocated to the QoS class using
- the QoS Class Regulator Parameters and additional bandwidth
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 81]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- to be shared by the QoS class. The additional share of
- bandwidth is determined according to the parameters of the
- waiting room pointed to by the Excess Scheduler Id. If the
- Excess Scheduler Id is specified in the QoS Class
- Establishment message, the additional bandwidth will be
- shared by the entire QoS class. If the Excess Scheduler Id
- is specified in each individual QoS Connection Management
- message, the additional bandwidth is specific to that
- connection and not shared by the entire QoS class. Care
- must be taken in the implementation to ensure that within
- each virtual path connection or virtual channel connection,
- cells depart in the same order that they arrived.
-
- x: Bits 3--7 of the Excess Action field are not used.
-
- QoS Class Weight
- If bit 1 of the Scheduler Flags field of the QoS
- Configuration message indicates that weighted service may
- be applied to a QoS class, the QoS Class Weight parameter
- specifies the share of the bandwidth available to the
- waiting room that should be given to this QoS class.
-
- The QoS Class Weight is an unsigned 16-bit field specifying
- a binary fraction. I.e. the bandwidth share, as a fraction
- of the bandwidth available to the waiting room, is given
- by:
-
- Bandwidth share = QoS Class Weight * 2**(-16)
-
- A QoS Class Weight of zero indicates equal sharing between
- all QoS classes sharing this waiting room that request a
- QoS Class Weight of zero. While a 16-bit field is used to
- specify the QoS Class Weight it is understood that the
- accuracy of the bandwidth sharing is hardware dependent and
- is not specified.
-
- If the Regulator field of the QoS Class Establishment
- message indicates None, or Policer, the QoS Class Weight
- should be applied to the waiting room pointed to by the
- Scheduler Identifier. If the Regulator field of the QoS
- Class Establishment message indicates Shaper, the QoS Class
- Weight should be applied to the waiting room pointed to by
- the Excess Scheduler Id.
-
- If the specified waiting room is unable to offer weighted
- sharing for a QoS class, a failure response message should
- be returned with the failure code indicating: "This waiting
- room is unable to offer weighted sharing for a QoS class."
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 82]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- Scheduler Identifier
- If all conforming traffic from this QoS class is directed
- to the same waiting room, on the same output port, this
- field specifies the Scheduler Identifier for the entire QoS
- class. The Scheduler Identifier points to the waiting room,
- on the output port specified by the Output Port field, to
- which all conforming traffic should be sent. If this field
- is not used it should be set to 0xFFFF. If each component
- connection of the QoS class specifies its own output port
- and waiting room, the Scheduler Identifier must be
- specified in the QoS Connection Management message and this
- field must be set to 0xFFFF.
-
- Excess Scheduler Id
- If all conforming traffic from this QoS class is directed
- to the same waiting room, on the same output port, this
- field specifies the Excess Scheduler Id for the entire QoS
- class. The Excess Scheduler Id points to the waiting room,
- on the output port specified by the Output Port field, to
- which all excess traffic should be sent. If this field is
- not used it should be set to 0xFFFF. If each component
- connection of the QoS class specifies its own output port
- and waiting room, the Excess Scheduler Id must be specified
- in the QoS Connection Management message and this field
- must be set to 0xFFFF. If the Scheduler Id is specified in
- the QoS Class Establishment message, the Excess Scheduler
- Id must also be specified in the QoS Class Establishment
- message (or not used). If the Scheduler Id is specified in
- the QoS Connection Management message, the Excess Scheduler
- Id must also be specified in the QoS Connection Management
- message (or not used). The Excess Scheduler Id must not
- point to the same waiting room on the same output port as
- the Scheduler Identifier.
-
- Output Port
- If the Scheduler Identifier field in the QoS Establishment
- message is not 0xFFFF the Output Port field specifies the
- Output Port to which traffic from this QoS class should be
- routed. If the Scheduler Identifier field in the QoS
- Establishment message is 0xFFFF, this field is not used.
-
- QoS Class Policer Parameters
- A policer function may be applied to a QoS class on output
- from the classifier independently of the regulator
- function. The QoS class policer function is identical to
- the connection policer function defined in the QoS
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 83]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- Connection Management message with the exception that it
- applies to all cells that belong to the QoS class rather
- than just cells that belong to a single connection.
-
- The QoS Class Policer Parameters have the following format:
-
- 0 1 2 3
- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | QoS Class Increment-1 |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | QoS Class Limit-1 |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | QoS Class Increment-2 |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | QoS Class Limit-2 |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Reserved |C|A|x x x x x x|
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
-
- The definition of these fields is given in the UPC
- Parameters section of the QoS Connection Management
- message.
-
- QoS Class Regulator Parameters
- The QoS class regulator function is identical to the
- regulator function defined in the QoS Connection Management
- message with the exception that it applies to all cells
- that belong to the QoS class rather than just cells that
- belong to a single connection.
-
- The QoS Class Regulator Parameters have the following
- format:
-
- 0 1 2 3
- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | QoS Class Regulator Increment |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | QoS Class Regulator Limit |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
-
- The definition of these fields is given in the Regulator
- Parameters section of the QoS Connection Management
- message.
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 84]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- 9.5 QoS Release Message
-
- The QoS Release message is used to delete a Scheduler Identifier or a
- QoS Class Identifier and to release all resources associated with it.
-
- The QoS Release message is:
-
- Message Type = 99
-
- The QoS Release request and success response messages have the
- following format:
-
- 0 1 2 3
- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Version | Message Type | Result | Code |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Transaction Identifier |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Port |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Port Session Number |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Reserved | Scheduler Identifier |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | QoS Class Identifier |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
-
- Port
- If the QoS Release message contains a Scheduler Identifier,
- the Port field must contain the Port Number of the switch
- output port to which the Scheduler Identifier applies. If
- the QoS Release message contains a QoS Class Identifier,
- any valid Port number may be used. (The QoS Class
- Identifier has a global namespace.)
-
- Port Session Number
- The current Port Session Number for the port specified in
- the Port field.
-
- Scheduler Identifier
- If the Scheduler Identifier contains the value 0xFFFF the
- QoS Class Identifier specified in the QoS Class Identifier
- field should be released. Else, if the value of the
- Scheduler Identifier lies in the range 0x0100 -- 0xFFFE
- inclusive, the Scheduler Identifier specified by the
- Scheduler Identifier field should be released. A Scheduler
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 85]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- Identifier with a value less than 0x0100 is invalid in a
- QoS Release message. (It specifies a default value which
- may not be released.)
-
- QoS Class Identifier
- If the Scheduler Identifier contains the value 0xFFFF the
- QoS Class Identifier field specifies the QoS Class
- Identifier to be released.
-
- If the QoS Release message requests that a Scheduler Identifier be
- released, and the Scheduler Identifier is still in use by one or more
- established connections, a failure response must be returned with the
- failure code indicating: "Scheduler Identifier still in use." If the
- QoS Release message requests that a QoS Class Identifier be released,
- and the QoS Class Identifier is still in use by one or more
- established connections, a failure response must be returned with the
- failure code indicating: "QoS Class Identifier still in use."
-
- 9.6 QoS Connection Management Message
-
- The QoS Connection Management message is used by the controller to
- establish and modify virtual channel connections and virtual path
- connections across the switch which require QoS parameters to be
- specified. The functionality of the QoS Connection Management message
- is identical to that of the Add Branch connection management message
- with the additional specification of QoS parameters. No specific QoS
- connection release messages are defined. QoS connections may be
- released with the Delete Tree, Delete All, and Delete Branches
- messages defined in Section 4, "Connection Management Messages." When
- a QoS connection is released, all associated QoS resources are
- released.
-
- There are three styles of connection with specified QoS parameters:
-
- QoS Connection:
- This connection style specifies its own individual QoS parameters
- and is routed independently to the waiting room and output port
- specified in the QoS Connection Management message. It is not a
- member of a QoS class. Each output branch of a point-to-multipoint
- QoS connection may specify its own QoS parameters which may be
- different from all other output branches of that point-to-
- multipoint QoS connection, if the switch supports this capability.
- However, all output branches must specify identical connection
- policer parameters. A QoS Connection Management message requesting
- this style of connection is identified by a QoS Class Identifier
- with the value 0xFFFFFFFF.
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 86]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- QoS Class Connection:
- This connection style does not specify its own individual QoS
- parameters. It is a member of a QoS class, and the QoS parameters
- are specified by the QoS class. It is, however, routed
- independently to the waiting room and output port specified in the
- QoS Connection Management message. Each output branch of a
- point-to-multipoint QoS Class Connection must use the same QoS
- parameters. A QoS Connection Management message requesting this
- style of connection will have a valid QoS Class Identifier and a
- valid Scheduler Identifier.
-
- QoS Class Member:
- This connection style does not specify its own individual QoS
- parameters. It is a member of a QoS class, and the QoS parameters
- are specified by the QoS class. The QoS class also specifies the
- waiting room and output port to which all members of the class are
- routed. This style of connection does not support point-to-
- multipoint connections. A QoS Connection Management message
- requesting this style of connection will have a valid QoS Class
- Identifier and a Scheduler Identifier with the value 0xFFFF.
-
- To request a virtual channel connection with specified QoS
- parameters, the Virtual Channel Connection (VCC) QoS Connection
- Management message is:
-
- Message Type = 100.
-
- To request a virtual path connection with specified QoS parameters,
- the Virtual Path Connection (VPC) QoS Connection Management message
- is:
-
- Message Type = 101.
-
- The QoS Connection Management message has the following format for
- both request and response messages:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 87]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- 0 1 2 3
- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Version | Message Type | Result | Code |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Transaction Identifier |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Port Session Number |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Input Port |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- |M|Q|B|C| Input VPI | Input VCI |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Output Port |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- |x x x x| Output VPI | Output VCI |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Number of Branches | Scheduler Identifier |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | QoS Class Identifier |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Regulator | Excess Action | Connection Weight |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- |S|A|x x x x x x| Reserved | Excess Scheduler Id |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | |
- ~ UPC Parameters ~
- | |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | |
- ~ Regulator Parameters ~
- | |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
-
- Port Session Number
- Input Port
- Input VPI
- Input VCI
- Output Port
- Output VPI
- Output VCI
- Number of Branches
- The definition of these fields is exactly the same as
- defined for the Add Branch message in Section 4.1,
- "Connection Management Messages."
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 88]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- M B C Flags
- The definition of the M, B, and C flags is exactly the same
- as defined in Section 4, "Connection Management Messages."
- They apply to the QoS Connection Management message exactly
- as defined for the Add Branch message.
-
- Q: QoS Profile Flag The QoS Profile flag is not used in the QoS
- Connection Management message.
-
- Scheduler Identifier
- For QoS Connection and QoS Class Connection styles, the
- Scheduler Identifier points to the waiting room, on the
- output port specified by the Output Port field, to which
- all conforming traffic on the connection should be routed.
- The values 0 -- 255 specify the default settings for the
- scheduler. Each of the default values maps directly to one
- of the scheduler priority levels. A Scheduler Identifier in
- the range 0 -- 255 may be used without first being
- established by a Scheduler Establishment message. All
- Scheduler Identifiers in the range 0x0100 to 0xFFFE must
- first be established by a Scheduler Establishment message.
-
- A Scheduler Identifier with a value of 0xFFFF indicates
- that a QoS Class Member connection style is being
- requested. In this connection style, the waiting room and
- output port are specified by reference to the QoS class
- specified by the QoS Class Identifier field. In this case
- the QoS Class Identifier field must contain a valid QoS
- Class Identifier.
-
- QoS Class Identifier
- For QoS Class Connection and QoS Class Member connection
- styles, the QoS Class Identifier specifies the QoS Class to
- which the connection belongs. It must first be established
- by a QoS Class Establishment message and must have a value
- greater than 0 and less than 0xFFFFFFFF.
-
- A QoS Class Identifier with a value of 0xFFFFFFFF indicates
- that a connection of style "QoS Connection" is being
- requested. In this connection style, the connection does
- not belong to a QoS class. All QoS parameters are specified
- by the QoS Connection Management message and apply only to
- the specified connection.
-
- Regulator
- Excess Action
- The Regulator and Excess Action parameters are only used in
- connection requests of style "QoS Connection." The
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 89]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- definition of these fields in the QoS Connection Management
- message is exactly the same as defined for the QoS Class
- Establishment message with the exception that they apply to
- an individual connection rather than to an entire QoS
- class.
-
- Connection Weight
- This field is only used in connections of style "QoS
- Connection" and "QoS Class Connection." For QoS Class
- Member style connections, the QoS Class Weight parameter of
- the QoS Class Establishment message should be used to
- assign a weight to the QoS Class.
-
- If bit 0 of the Scheduler Flags field of the QoS
- Configuration message indicates that weighted service may
- be applied to a connection, the Connection Weight parameter
- specifies the share of the bandwidth available to the
- waiting room that should be given to this connection.
-
- The Connection Weight is an unsigned 16-bit field
- specifying a binary fraction. I.e. the bandwidth share, as
- a fraction of the bandwidth available to the waiting room,
- is given by:
-
- Bandwidth share = Connection Weight * 2**(-16)
-
- A Connection Weight of zero indicates equal sharing between
- all connections in this waiting room that request a
- Connection Weight of zero. While a 16-bit field is used to
- specify the Connection Weight it is understood that the
- accuracy of the bandwidth sharing is hardware dependent and
- is not specified.
-
- For connections of style "QoS Class Connection," if the
- Regulator function of the QoS Class is specified as None,
- or Policer, the Connection Weight should be applied to the
- waiting room pointed to by the Scheduler Identifier field
- in the QoS Connection Management message. If the Regulator
- function of the QoS Class is specified as Shaper, the
- Connection Weight should be applied to the waiting room
- pointed to by the Excess Scheduler Id field in the QoS
- Connection Management message.
-
- For connections of style "QoS Connection," if the Regulator
- field of the QoS Connection Management message specifies
- None, or Policer, the Connection Weight should be applied
- to the waiting room pointed to by the Scheduler Identifier
- field. If the Regulator field of the QoS Connection
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 90]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- Management message specifies Shaper, the Connection Weight
- should be applied to the waiting room pointed to by the
- Excess Scheduler Id field.
-
- If the specified waiting room is unable to offer weighted
- sharing for a connection, a failure response message should
- be returned with the failure code indicating: "this waiting
- room is unable to offer weighted sharing for a connection."
-
- QoS Flags
-
- S: Selective Discard
- If the Selective Discard flag is set, only cells with the
- Cell Loss Priority (CLP) bit set will be subject to the
- discard mechanism when the number of cells in the waiting
- room exceeds the Discard Threshold. If the Selective
- Discard flag is zero, all cells (CLP=0 and CLP=1) will be
- subject to the discard mechanism when the number of cells
- in the waiting room exceeds the Discard Threshold.
- Selective discard can be combined with packet discard. In
- this case only packets in which at least one cell has the
- CLP bit set will be subject to the discard mechanism.
-
- A: All Branches
- For a QoS Connection Management message that specifies a
- point-to-multipoint connection, if the All Branches flag is
- set, all branches of the point-to-multipoint connection
- must be set to the QoS parameters specified in the message.
- If the All Branches flag is zero, only the single output
- branch specified in the message should be set to the QoS
- parameters specified in the message. For a QoS Connection
- Management message that specifies a point-to-point
- connection, the All Branches flag is not used.
-
- x: Unused
-
- Excess Scheduler Id
- For connections of style "QoS Connection" and "QoS Class
- Connection," the Excess Scheduler Id points to the waiting
- room, on the output port specified by the Output Port
- field, to which all excess traffic should be routed. The
- values 0 -- 255 specify the default settings for the
- scheduler. Each of the default values maps directly to one
- of the scheduler priority levels. An Excess Scheduler Id in
- the range 0 -- 255 may be used without first being
- established by a Scheduler Establishment message. All
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 91]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- values of Excess Scheduler Id in the range 0x0100 to 0xFFFE
- must first be established by a Scheduler Establishment
- message.
-
- If this field is not used it should be set to 0xFFFF. The
- Excess Scheduler Id must not point to the same waiting room
- on the same output port as the Scheduler Identifier.
-
- UPC Parameters
- All connection styles may be subject to a Usage Parameter
- Control (UPC) function, also known as a connection policer.
- The policing function is applied to each individual
- connection before it is combined with other connections
- into a QoS class by the classifier function. A policing
- function applied to an entire QoS class is defined in the
- QoS Class Establishment message.
-
- The connection policer is defined by reference to the
- Generic Cell Rate Algorithm (GCRA) defined by the ATM Forum
- [af-tm-0056], although any equivalent policing algorithm
- may be used. The GCRA takes two parameters, the increment
- (I) and the limit (L). The reciprocal of the increment
- (1/I) specifies the rate being policed. The limit specifies
- the burst tolerance. (For comparison with the token bucket
- policer discussed in [Partridge], the size of the token
- bucket is given by L/I.)
-
- Two policers in series may be specified to permit the
- policing of both peak rate and average rate (also called
- sustainable rate). The parameters for the first policer are
- Increment-1 and Limit-1. For comparison with the ATM Forum
- specification these would be used to police the Peak Cell
- Rate (PCR) and Cell Delay Variation Tolerance (CDVT)
- respectively. The parameters for the second policer are
- Increment-2 and Limit-2. For comparison with the ATM Forum
- specification these would be used to police the Sustainable
- Cell Rate (SCR), and Burst Tolerance. (The Burst Tolerance
- may be computed from the Maximum Burst Size [af-tm-0056].)
-
- There are two configurations in which the two policers may
- be connected in series. In the All Cells configuration,
- all cells (cells with the Cell Loss Priority (CLP) bit set
- to zero and cells with the CLP bit set to one) are subject
- to the policing action of both policers in series. In the
- CLP Selective configuration, all cells, both CLP=0 and
- CLP=1, are policed by the first policer; but only cells
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 92]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- with CLP=0 are subject to policing by the second policer.
- Either tagging or discard may be specified for each of the
- policer configurations.
-
- The values of the parameters Increment and Limit in the UPC
- Parameters fields are given in terms of a time unit
- specified by the switch in the QoS Configuration Parameters
- message. The time unit is specified by the switch as a
- rate, the Scaling Factor, which gives the rate in cells per
- second that would result from an Increment parameter value
- of one. Thus to determine the value of the Increment
- parameter from the desired policed rate given in cells per
- second:
-
- Increment parameter = (Scaling_Factor)/(policed_rate)
-
- To determine the value of the Limit parameter from the
- desired Cell Delay Variation Tolerance (CDVT) given in
- seconds:
-
- Limit parameter = CDVT * Scaling_Factor
-
- To determine the value of the Limit parameter from the
- desired Burst Tolerance (BT) given in seconds:
-
- Limit parameter = BT * Scaling_Factor
-
- The Increment and Limit parameters are specified as 32-bit
- unsigned integers; so the choice of the Scaling Factor
- allows the switch to select the range and granularity of
- the policer parameters with respect to the line rate of the
- switch port. For example, a SONET STS-3c (155.52 Mbps)
- switch port has a line rate of approximately 353 kcells/s.
- With a Scaling Factor value of 353,000,000 we can specify a
- policed rate slightly less than the line rate with a
- granularity of 0.1%. For a policed rate of 1 kbps we can
- still support a bucket size of 31 cells.
-
- The UPC Parameters have the following format:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 93]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- 0 1 2 3
- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Increment-1 |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Limit-1 |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Increment-2 |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Limit-2 |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Reserved |C|A|x x x x x x|
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
-
- Increment-1
- The increment parameter for the first policer, specified as
- a 32-bit unsigned integer. A value of zero for the
- Increment-1 parameter is used to disable the first policer.
- In this case all cells will be considered to conform to the
- traffic parameters of the first policer.
-
- Limit-1
- The limit parameter for the first policer, specified as a
- 32-bit unsigned integer.
-
- Increment-2
- The increment parameter for the second policer, specified
- as a 32-bit unsigned integer. A value of zero for the
- Increment-2 parameter is used to disable the second
- policer. In this case all cells will be considered to
- conform to the traffic parameters of the second policer.
-
- Limit-2
- The limit parameter for the second policer, specified as a
- 32-bit unsigned integer.
-
- Flags
-
- C: Configuration
- If the Configuration flag is set, the policer should be set
- to the All Cells configuration. If the Configuration flag
- is zero, the policer should be set to the CLP Selective
- configuration.
-
- In the All Cells configuration, all cells (both CLP=0 and
- CLP=1) are subject to the policing action of both policers
- in series. In the CLP Selective configuration, all cells,
- both CLP=0 and CLP=1, are policed by the first policer; but
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 94]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- only cells with CLP=0 are subject to policing by the second
- policer. Either tagging or discard may be specified for
- each of the policer configurations.
-
- A: Action
- If the Action flag is zero, discard is required as the
- policing action. If the Action flag is set, tagging is
- required as the policing action.
-
- If tagging is selected in the All Cells configuration, any
- cell with CLP=0 in either policer, that the policer
- determines to be in excess of the specified policer
- parameters, will be changed to CLP=1. If discard is
- selected in the All Cells configuration, any cell (CLP=0 or
- CLP=1) in either policer, that the policer determines to be
- in excess of the specified policer parameters, will be
- discarded.
-
- In the CLP Selective configuration, the first policer is
- always set to discard any cell (CLP=0 or CLP=1) that it
- determines to be in excess of its specified policer
- parameters. If tagging is selected in the CLP Selective
- configuration, the second policer will change the CLP bit
- to CLP=1 of any cell that it determines to be in excess of
- its specified parameters. If discard is selected in the CLP
- Selective configuration, the second policer will discard
- any cell that it determines to be in excess of its
- specified parameters.
-
- To configure the policer for the conformance definitions
- specified by the ATM Forum [af-tm-0056] the following
- configurations are suggested:
-
- CBR.1: One policer, All Cells, Discard
- VBR.1: Two policers, All Cells, Discard
- VBR.2: Two policers, CLP Selective, Discard
- VBR.3: Two policers, CLP Selective, Tagging
- UBR.1: One policer, All Cells, Discard
- UBR.2: One policer, All Cells, Tagging.
-
- x: Unused
-
- Regulator Parameters
- Only connections of style "QoS Connection" require the
- Regulator Parameters to be specified in the QoS Connection
- Management message. For connections of style "QoS Class
- Connection" and "QoS Class Member" the Regulator Parameters
- are specified in the QoS Class Establishment message.
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 95]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- The Regulator Parameters are specified in a similar manner
- to the UPC parameters. If the regulator function is
- specified as Policing, a single GCRA policer is applied to
- all cells (both CLP=0 and CLP=1) on the connection. The
- policer takes two parameters: an increment, the Regulator
- Increment, and a limit, the Regulator Limit. The reciprocal
- of the increment (1/I) specifies the rate being policed.
- The limit (L) specifies the burst tolerance. (For
- comparison with the token bucket policer discussed in
- [Partridge], the size of the token bucket is given by L/I.)
-
- The Regulator Increment and Regulator Limit parameters are
- 32-bit unsigned integers. Their values are determined in
- terms of the Scaling Factor specified by the switch in the
- QoS Configuration Parameters message. To determine the
- value of the Regulator Increment parameter from the desired
- policed rate given in cells per second:
-
- Regulator Increment = (Scaling_Factor)/(policed_rate)
-
- For a policed rate (r) the GCRA policer guarantees that
- over any time period T the amount of traffic determined by
- the policer to be conforming to the traffic parameters does
- not exceed:
-
- rT + L/I
-
- The value of the Regulator Limit may be determined from
- this relation.
-
- If the regulator function is specified as Shaping, only the
- Regulator Increment parameter is used. The Regulator Limit
- parameter is not used. The value of the Regulator Increment
- parameter is determined in terms of the Scaling Factor
- specified by the switch in the QoS Configuration Parameters
- message. To determine the value of the Regulator Increment
- parameter from the desired shaper rate, given in cells per
- second, on output from the shaper:
-
- Regulator Increment = (Scaling_Factor)/(shaper_rate)
-
- An Increment value of zero is used to disable the policer.
- In this case all cells on that connection will be
- considered to conform to the policer traffic parameters. A
- shaper given a Regulator Increment parameter of zero will
- perform no shaping function on that connection.
-
- The Regulator Parameters have the following format:
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 96]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- 0 1 2 3
- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Regulator Increment |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Regulator Limit |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
-
- 9.7 QoS Failure Response Codes
-
- A failure response message is formed by returning the request message
- that caused the failure with the Result field in the header
- indicating failure (Result = 4) and the Code field giving the failure
- code. The failure code specifies the reason for the switch being
- unable to satisfy the request message. The following additional
- failure codes are defined for use in response to QoS messages.
- General failure codes are specified in Section 3.2, Failure Response
- Messages.
-
- 128: Weighted scheduling within this waiting room is unavailable.
- 129: This waiting room is unable to offer weighted sharing for a
- QoS class.
- 130: This waiting room is unable to offer weighted sharing for a
- connection.
- 131: Scheduler Identifier still in use.
- 132: QoS Class Identifier still in use.
- 133: Invalid QoS parameter.
- 134: Insufficient QoS resources.
- 135: Any point-to-multipoint connection arriving on this input
- port must use the same QoS parameters for all output
- branches.
-
-
- 10. Adjacency Protocol
-
- The adjacency protocol is used to synchronize state across the link,
- to agree on which version of the protocol to use, to discover the
- identity of the entity at the other end of a link, and to detect when
- it changes. GSMP is a hard state protocol. It is therefore important
- to detect loss of contact between switch and controller, and to
- detect any change of identity of switch or controller. No GSMP
- messages other than those of the adjacency protocol may be sent
- across the link until the adjacency protocol has achieved
- synchronization.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 97]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- 10.1 Packet Format
-
- All GSMP messages belonging to the adjacency protocol have the
- following structure:
-
- 0 1 2 3
- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Version | Message Type | Timer |M| Code |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Sender Name |
- + +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | | |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ +
- | Receiver Name |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Sender Port |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Receiver Port |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Sender Instance |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Receiver Instance |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
-
- Version
- In the adjacency protocol the Version field is used for
- version negotiation. In a SYN message the Version field
- always contains the highest version understood by the
- sender. A receiver receiving a SYN message with a version
- higher than understood will ignore that message. A
- receiver receiving a SYN message with a version lower than
- its own highest version, but a version that it understands,
- will reply with a SYNACK with the version from the received
- SYN in its GSMP Version field. This defines the version of
- the GSMP protocol to be used while the adjacency protocol
- remains synchronized. All other messages will use the
- agreed version in the Version field.
-
- The version number for the version of the GSMP protocol
- defined by this specification is Version = 2.
-
- Message Type
- The adjacency protocol is:
-
- Message Type = 10
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 98]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- Timer
- The Timer field is used to inform the receiver of the timer
- value used in the adjacency protocol of the sender. The
- timer specifies the nominal time between periodic adjacency
- protocol messages. It is a constant for the duration of a
- GSMP session. The timer field is specified in units of
- 100ms.
-
- M-Flag
- The M-Flag is used in the SYN message to indicate whether
- the sender is a master or a slave. If the M-Flag is set in
- the SYN message, the sender is a master. If zero, the
- sender is a slave. The GSMP protocol is asymmetric, the
- controller being the master and the switch being the slave.
- The M-Flag prevents a master from synchronizing with
- another master, or a slave with another slave. If a slave
- receives a SYN message with a zero M-Flag, it must ignore
- that SYN message. If a master receives a SYN message with
- the M-Flag set, it must ignore that SYN message. In all
- other messages the M-Flag is not used.
-
- Code
- Field specifies the function of the message. Four Codes are
- defined for the adjacency protocol:
-
- SYN: Code = 1
- SYNACK: Code = 2
- ACK: Code = 3
- RSTACK: Code = 4.
-
- Sender Name
- For the SYN, SYNACK, and ACK messages, is the name of the
- entity sending the message. The Sender Name is a 48-bit
- quantity that is unique within the operational context of
- the device. A 48-bit IEEE 802 MAC address, if available,
- may be used for the Sender Name. If the Ethernet
- encapsulation is used the Sender Name must be the Source
- Address from the MAC header. For the RSTACK message, the
- Sender Name field is set to the value of the Receiver Name
- field from the incoming message that caused the RSTACK
- message to be generated.
-
- Receiver Name
- For the SYN, SYNACK, and ACK messages, is the name of the
- entity that the sender of the message believes is at the
- far end of the link. If the sender of the message does not
- know the name of the entity at the far end of the link,
- this field should be set to zero. For the RSTACK message,
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 99]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- the Receiver Name field is set to the value of the Sender
- Name field from the incoming message that caused the RSTACK
- message to be generated.
-
- Sender Port
- For the SYN, SYNACK, and ACK messages, is the local port
- number of the link across which the message is being sent.
- For the RSTACK message, the Sender Port field is set to the
- value of the Receiver Port field from the incoming message
- that caused the RSTACK message to be generated.
-
- Receiver Port
- For the SYN, SYNACK, and ACK messages, is what the sender
- believes is the local port number for the link, allocated
- by the entity at the far end of the link. If the sender of
- the message does not know the port number at the far end of
- the link, this field should be set to zero. For the RSTACK
- message, the Receiver Port field is set to the value of the
- Sender Port field from the incoming message that caused the
- RSTACK message to be generated.
-
- Sender Instance
- For the SYN, SYNACK, and ACK messages, is the sender's
- instance number for the link. It is used to detect when the
- link comes back up after going down or when the identity of
- the entity at the other end of the link changes. The
- instance number is a 32-bit number that is guaranteed to be
- unique within the recent past and to change when the link
- or node comes back up after going down. Zero is not a valid
- instance number. For the RSTACK message, the Sender
- Instance field is set to the value of the Receiver Instance
- field from the incoming message that caused the RSTACK
- message to be generated.
-
- Receiver Instance
- For the SYN, SYNACK, and ACK messages, is what the sender
- believes is the current instance number for the link,
- allocated by the entity at the far end of the link. If the
- sender of the message does not know the current instance
- number at the far end of the link, this field should be set
- to zero. For the RSTACK message, the Receiver Instance
- field is set to the value of the Sender Instance field from
- the incoming message that caused the RSTACK message to be
- generated.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 100]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- 10.2 Procedure
-
- The adjacency protocol is described by the following rules and state
- tables.
-
- The rules and state tables use the following operations:
-
- o The "Update Peer Verifier" operation is defined as storing the
- values of the Sender Instance, Sender Port, and Sender Name fields
- from a SYN or SYNACK message received from the entity at the far
- end of the link.
-
- o The procedure "Reset the link" is defined as:
-
- 1. Generate a new instance number for the link
- 2. Delete the peer verifier (set to zero the values of Sender
- Instance, Sender Port, and Sender Name previously stored by
- the Update Peer Verifier operation)
- 3. Send a SYN message
- 4. Enter the SYNSENT state.
-
- o The state tables use the following Boolean terms and operators:
-
- A The Sender Instance in the incoming message matches the
- value stored from a previous message by the "Update Peer
- Verifier" operation.
-
- B The Sender Instance, Sender Port, and Sender Name fields in
- the incoming message match the values stored from a
- previous message by the "Update Peer Verifier" operation.
-
- C The Receiver Instance, Receiver Port, and Receiver Name
- fields in the incoming message match the values of the
- Sender Instance, Sender Port, and Sender Name currently
- sent in outgoing SYN, SYNACK, and ACK messages.
-
- "&&" Represents the logical AND operation
-
- "||" Represents the logical OR operation
-
- "!" Represents the logical negation (NOT) operation.
-
- o A timer is required for the periodic generation of SYN, SYNACK,
- and ACK messages. The value of the timer is announced in the Timer
- field. The period of the timer is unspecified but a value of one
- second is suggested.
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 101]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- There are two independent events: the timer expires, and a packet
- arrives. The processing rules for these events are:
-
- Timer Expires: Reset Timer
- If state = SYNSENT Send SYN
- If state = SYNRCVD Send SYNACK
- If state = ESTAB Send ACK
-
- Packet Arrives:
- If incoming message is an RSTACK:
- If (A && C && !SYNSENT) Reset the link
- Else Discard the message.
- If incoming message is a SYN, SYNACK, or ACK:
- Response defined by the following State Tables.
- If incoming message is any other GSMP message and state !=
- ESTAB:
- Discard incoming message.
- If state = SYNSENT Send SYN (Note 1)
- If state = SYNRCVD Send SYNACK (Note 1)
-
- Note 1: No more than two SYN or SYNACK messages should be
- sent within any time period of length defined by the
- timer.
-
- o State synchronization across a link is considered to be achieved
- when the protocol reaches the ESTAB state. All GSMP messages,
- other than adjacency protocol messages, that are received before
- synchronization is achieved will be discarded.
-
- State Tables
-
- State: SYNSENT
-
- +======================================================================+
- | Condition | Action | New State |
- +====================+=====================================+===========+
- | SYNACK && C | Update Peer Verifier; Send ACK | ESTAB |
- +--------------------+-------------------------------------+-----------+
- | SYNACK && !C | Send RSTACK | SYNSENT |
- +--------------------+-------------------------------------+-----------+
- | SYN | Update Peer Verifier; Send SYNACK | SYNRCVD |
- +--------------------+-------------------------------------+-----------+
- | ACK | Send RSTACK | SYNSENT |
- +======================================================================+
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 102]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- State: SYNRCVD
-
- +======================================================================+
- | Condition | Action | New State |
- +====================+=====================================+===========+
- | SYNACK && C | Update Peer Verifier; Send ACK | ESTAB |
- +--------------------+-------------------------------------+-----------+
- | SYNACK && !C | Send RSTACK | SYNRCVD |
- +--------------------+-------------------------------------+-----------+
- | SYN | Update Peer Verifier; Send SYNACK | SYNRCVD |
- +--------------------+-------------------------------------+-----------+
- | ACK && B && C | Send ACK | ESTAB |
- +--------------------+-------------------------------------+-----------+
- | ACK && !(B && C) | Send RSTACK | SYNRCVD |
- +======================================================================+
-
-
- State: ESTAB
-
- +======================================================================+
- | Condition | Action | New State |
- +====================+=====================================+===========+
- | SYN || SYNACK | Send ACK (note 2) | ESTAB |
- +--------------------+-------------------------------------+-----------+
- | ACK && B && C | Send ACK (note 3) | ESTAB |
- +--------------------+-------------------------------------+-----------+
- | ACK && !(B && C) | Send RSTACK | ESTAB |
- +======================================================================+
-
- Note 2: No more than two ACKs should be sent within any time period
- of length defined by the timer. Thus, one ACK must be sent every time
- the timer expires. In addition, one further ACK may be sent between
- timer expirations if the incoming message is a SYN or SYNACK. This
- additional ACK allows the adjacency protocol to reach synchronization
- more quickly.
-
- Note 3: No more than one ACK should be sent within any time period of
- length defined by the timer.
-
- 10.3 Loss of Synchronization
-
- If after synchronization is achieved, no valid GSMP messages are
- received in any period of time in excess of three times the value of
- the Timer field announced in the incoming adjacency protocol
- messages, loss of synchronization may be declared.
-
- The preferred procedure for a switch to use when it looses
- synchronization with its active controller is to attempt to establish
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 103]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- synchronization with (one of) its backup controller(s). However, in
- this preferred approach, it must not reset its state until it
- achieves synchronization with a backup controller. This means that
- if, before achieving synchronization with a backup controller, it
- regains synchronization with its original controller, it may continue
- the original session (and cease attempting to establish
- synchronization with a backup controller). If synchronization with
- the original session is regained it is the responsibility of the
- controller to ensure consistent state between the switch and
- controller.
-
- While the above is the preferred procedure, it is also the case that
- the simplest procedure when declaring loss of synchronization with
- the active controller is to reset the switch state, and start
- searching for a controller. This simple procedure is legitimate.
-
- 11. Summary of Failure Response Codes
-
- The following list gives a summary of the failure codes defined for
- failure response messages:
-
- 1: Unspecified reason not covered by other failure codes.
- 2: Invalid request message.
- 3: The specified request is not implemented on this switch.
- 4: Invalid Port Session Number.
- 5: One or more of the specified ports does not exist.
- 6: One or more of the specified ports is down.
- 7: Unused. (This failure code has been replaced by failure codes
- 18--21.)
- 8: The specified connection does not exist.
- 9: The specified branch does not exist.
- 10: A branch belonging to the specified point-to-multipoint
- connection is already established on the specified output
- port and the switch cannot support more than a single
- branch of any point-to-multipoint connection on the same
- output port.
- 11: The limit on the maximum number of point-to-multipoint
- connections that the switch can support has been reached.
- 12: The limit on the maximum number of branches that the
- specified point-to-multipoint connection can support has
- been reached.
- 13: Unable to assign the requested VPI/VCI value to the requested
- branch on the specified point-to-multipoint connection.
- 14: General problem related to the manner in which point-to-
- multipoint is supported by the switch.
- 15: Out of resources (e.g. memory exhausted, etc.).
- 16: Failure specific to the particular message type. (The meaning
- of this failure code depends upon the Message Type. It is
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 104]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- defined within the description of any message that uses
- it.)
- 17: Cannot label each output branch of a point-to-multipoint tree
- with a different label.
- 18: One or more of the specified input VPIs is invalid.
- 19: One or more of the specified input VCIs is invalid.
- 20: One or more of the specified output VPIs is invalid.
- 21: One or more of the specified output VCIs is invalid.
- 22: Invalid Class of Service field in a Connection Management
- message.
- 23: Insufficient resources for QoS Profile.
- 24: Virtual path switching is not supported on this input port.
- 25: Point-to-multipoint virtual path connections are not
- supported on either the requested input port or the
- requested output port.
- 26: Attempt to add a virtual path connection branch to an
- existing virtual channel connection.
- 27: Attempt to add a virtual channel connection branch to an
- existing virtual path connection.
- 28: Only point-to-point bidirectional connections may be
- established.
- 29: Cannot support requested VPI range.
- 30: Cannot support requested VCI range on all requested VPIs.
- 31: The transmit cell rate of this output port cannot be changed.
- 32: Requested transmit cell rate out of range for this output
- port.
- 128: Weighted scheduling within this waiting room is unavailable.
- 129: This waiting room is unable to offer weighted sharing for a
- QoS class.
- 130: This waiting room is unable to offer weighted sharing for a
- connection.
- 131: Scheduler Identifier still in use.
- 132: QoS Class Identifier still in use.
- 133: Invalid QoS parameter.
- 134: Insufficient QoS resources.
- 135: Any point-to-multipoint connection arriving on this input
- port must use the same QoS parameters for all output
- branches.
-
-
- 12. Summary of Message Set
-
- The following table gives a summary of the messages defined in this
- version of the specification. It also indicates which messages must
- be supported in a minimal implementation of the protocol. Those
- messages marked as "Required" must be supported by the switch for an
- implementation to be considered to conform to this specification.
- (While the controller should also implement those messages marked
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 105]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- "Required," conformance cannot be tested for the controller due to
- the Master-Slave nature of the protocol.)
-
- Message Name Message Type Status
-
- Connection Management Messages
- Add Branch VCC....................16 Required
- VPC....................26
- Delete Tree.......................18
- Delete All........................20
- Delete Branches...................17 Required
- Move Branch VCC...................22
- VPC...................27
-
- Port Management Messages
- Port Management...................32 Required
- Label Range.......................33
-
- State and Statistics Messages
- Connection Activity...............48
- Port Statistics...................49 Required
- Connection Statistics.............50
- QoS Class Statistics..............51
- Report Connection State...........52
-
- Configuration Messages
- Switch Configuration..............64 Required
- Port Configuration................65 Required
- All Ports Configuration...........66 Required
-
- Event Messages
- Port Up...........................80
- Port Down.........................81
- Invalid VPI/VCI...................82
- New Port..........................83
- Dead Port.........................84
-
- Quality of Service Messages
- QoS Configuration.................96
- Scheduler Establishment...........97
- QoS Class Establishment...........98
- QoS Release.......................99
- QoS Connection Management VCC....100
- VPC....101
-
- Adjacency Protocol....................10 Required
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 106]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- REFERENCES
-
- [af-tm-0056] ATM Forum Traffic Management Specification 4.0, af-tm-
- 0056.000, April 1996.
-
- [I.361] "B-ISDN ATM Layer Specification," International
- Telecommunication Union, ITU-T Recommendation I.361,
- Mar. 1993.
-
- [I.363] "B-ISDN ATM Adaptation Layer (AAL) Specification,"
- International Telecommunication Union, ITU-T
- Recommendation I.363, Mar. 1993.
-
- [IpsilonMIB] Ipsilon IP Switch MIB,
- http://www.ipsilon.com/products/ips.mib
-
- [Partridge] C. Partridge, "Gigabit Networking," Addison-Wesley,
- 1994.
-
- [RFC1700] Reynolds, J., and J. Postel, "Assigned Numbers," STD 2,
- RFC 1700, October 1994.
-
- [RFC1987] Newman, P, Edwards, W., hinden, R., Hoffman, E. Ching
- Liaw, F., Lyon, T. and G. Minshall, "Ipsilon's General
- Switch Management Protocol Specification," Version 1.1,
- RFC 1987, August 1996.
-
-
- SECURITY CONSIDERATIONS
-
- Physical security on the control link connecting the controller to
- the switch is assumed. Security issues are not discussed in this
- document.
-
-
- AUTHORS' ADDRESSES
-
- Peter Newman Phone: +1 (408) 990 2003
- Nokia EMail: pn@ipsilon.com
-
- W. L. Edwards, Chief Scientist Phone: +1 (913) 534 5334
- Sprint EMail: texas@sprintcorp.com
-
- Robert M. Hinden Phone: +1 (408) 990 2004
- Nokia EMail: hinden@ipsilon.com
-
- Eric Hoffman Phone: +1 (408) 990 2010
- Nokia EMail: hoffman@ipsilon.com
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 107]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- Fong Ching Liaw Phone: +1 (408) 873 2688
- Coppercom EMail: fong@coppercom.com
-
- Tom Lyon Phone: +1 (408) 990 2001
- Nokia EMail: pugs@ipsilon.com
-
- Greg Minshall Phone: +1 (650) 237 3164
- Fiberlane Communications EMail: minshall@fiberlane.com
-
- Nokia (Sunnyvale) is located at:
-
- 232 Java Drive
- Sunnyvale, CA 94089
- USA
-
- Sprint is located at:
-
- Sprint
- Sprint Technology Services - Long Distance Division
- 9300 Metcalf Avenue
- Mailstop KSOPKB0802
- Overland Park, KS 66212-6333
- USA
-
- Fiberlane Communications is located at:
-
- 1399 Charleston Road
- Mountain View, CA 94043
- USA
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 108]
-
- RFC 2297 Ipsilon's General Switch Management March 1998
-
-
- Full Copyright Statement
-
- Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1998). All Rights Reserved.
-
- This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
- others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
- or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
- and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
- kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
- included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
- document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
- the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
- Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
- developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
- copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
- followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
- English.
-
- The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
- revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
-
- This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
- "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
- TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
- BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
- HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
- MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newman, et. al. Informational [Page 109]
-
-